Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This article introduces LeakageBench, a new benchmark specifically designed to evaluate document-level PII redaction risks in image-based documents like scans and screenshots. By testing various OCR pipelines and vision-language models against GDPR-aligned annotations, it highlights the persistent gap between improved entity localization and actual page-level safety for data release. The study underscores that current AI tools still fail to sufficiently mitigate leakage risks in complex visual layouts, necessitating more robust spatially grounded detection methods.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

LeakageBench: Document-Level Leakage Risk for Redacting Personally Identifiable Information in Document Images

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.02207v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Real-world personally identifiable information (PII) redaction often operates on document images---scans, screenshots, and PDF renderings---where OCR errors, layout structure, and visual noise determine whether sensitive information is actually removed. Existing PII benchmarks are mostly text-centric and do not measure document-level redaction risk: a page remains unsafe if even one identifier is missed. We introduce LeakageBench, a challenge set of 500 document images with 11,954 GDPR-aligned PII annotations spanning direct identifiers, linkage keys, and contextual re-identification surfaces. We evaluate generic OCR pipelines, commercial and task-adapted OCR-dependent detectors, and OCR-free vision-language models using entity-level F1, group-wise leakage, and document-level leakage metrics. Code Interpreter raises GPT-5.5 localization F1 from 0.090 to 0.249, but critical page-level leakage remains 0.968. These results show that stronger detection and tool assistance improve localization without making most pages safe for release. LeakageBench provides a diagnostic benchmark for high-recall, spatially grounded PII redaction in document images.

Abstract:Real-world personally identifiable information (PII) redaction often operates on document images---scans, screenshots, and PDF renderings---where OCR errors, layout structure, and visual noise determine whether sensitive information is actually removed. Existing PII benchmarks are mostly text-centric and do not measure document-level redaction risk: a page remains unsafe if even one identifier is missed. We introduce LeakageBench, a challenge set of 500 document images with 11,954 GDPR-aligned PII annotations spanning direct identifiers, linkage keys, and contextual re-identification surfaces. We evaluate generic OCR pipelines, commercial and task-adapted OCR-dependent detectors, and OCR-free vision-language models using entity-level F1, group-wise leakage, and document-level leakage metrics. Code Interpreter raises GPT-5.5 localization F1 from 0.090 to 0.249, but critical page-level leakage remains 0.968. These results show that stronger detection and tool assistance improve localization without making most pages safe for release. LeakageBench provides a diagnostic benchmark for high-recall, spatially grounded PII redaction in document images.

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.02207 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2609.02207v1 [cs.CV] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02207 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words

Related coverage