aiqbench analysis
This study establishes a rigorous, leakage-safe benchmark for EEG-based dementia classification, identifying a specific pipeline combining ASR, ICA, and linear SVMs as the current best practice. By standardizing preprocessing and validation protocols across diverse studies, it provides an interpretable baseline that significantly aids reproducibility in neuro-AI research. The findings offer concrete guidance for developers aiming to build robust machine learning models for cognitive disorder screening using non-invasive signals.
Leakage-Safe Empirical Benchmarking of EEG-Based Machine Learning Pipelines for Dementia Classification
arXiv:2609.22092v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) is a low-cost and non-invasive signal source for dementia screening, yet existing EEG-based studies remain difficult to compare because preprocessing, EEG segmentation, feature design, classifier choice, and validation protocols vary across studies and are often evaluated in isolation. This variability limits the derivation of robust pipeline recommendations. This paper presents a leakage-safe empirical benchmark for resting-state EEG-based dementia classification and uses it to identify a practical best-practice pipeline. Using the public OpenNeuro ds004504 dataset, the benchmark evaluates artifact correction, fixed-length EEG segmentation, training-only augmentation, multi-domain feature extraction, fold-internal feature selection, classical machine-learning (ML) classifiers, subject-level aggregation, and interpretation under leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation. The best-performing pipeline in this benchmark combines Artifact Subspace Reconstruction (ASR) followed by Independent Component Analysis (ICA), 10 s EEG epochs with training-only amplitude scaling and Gaussian-noise augmentation, spectral, complexity, and pairwise connectivity features, mutual-information top-100 selection, linear support vector machine classification, and mean-probability aggregation. It achieves 87.69 percent accuracy, 88.89 percent F1-score, and 91.20 percent AUC on Alzheimer disease (AD) versus cognitively normal controls (CN) classification while retaining 100 features from 1596 raw descriptors. The results support compact multi-domain EEG features as an interpretable and leakage-safe baseline for subject-level dementia classification.
Abstract:Electroencephalography (EEG) is a low-cost and non-invasive signal source for dementia screening, yet existing EEG-based studies remain difficult to compare because preprocessing, EEG segmentation, feature design, classifier choice, and validation protocols vary across studies and are often evaluated in isolation. This variability limits the derivation of robust pipeline recommendations. This paper presents a leakage-safe empirical benchmark for resting-state EEG-based dementia classification and uses it to identify a practical best-practice pipeline. Using the public OpenNeuro ds004504 dataset, the benchmark evaluates artifact correction, fixed-length EEG segmentation, training-only augmentation, multi-domain feature extraction, fold-internal feature selection, classical machine-learning (ML) classifiers, subject-level aggregation, and interpretation under leave-one-subject-out (LOSO) validation. The best-performing pipeline in this benchmark combines Artifact Subspace Reconstruction (ASR) followed by Independent Component Analysis (ICA), 10 s EEG epochs with training-only amplitude scaling and Gaussian-noise augmentation, spectral, complexity, and pairwise connectivity features, mutual-information top-100 selection, linear support vector machine classification, and mean-probability aggregation. It achieves 87.69 percent accuracy, 88.89 percent F1-score, and 91.20 percent AUC on Alzheimer disease (AD) versus cognitively normal controls (CN) classification while retaining 100 features from 1596 raw descriptors. The results support compact multi-domain EEG features as an interpretable and leakage-safe baseline for subject-level dementia classification.
Signal Processing (eess.SP); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.22092 [eess.SP]
(or arXiv:2609.22092v1 [eess.SP] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22092 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026