aiqbench analysis
This research identifies "lazy grounding," a vulnerability where search agents incorrectly adopt factual evidence intended for nearby questions, significantly reducing accuracy even without malicious misinformation. The study demonstrates that robust AI systems must evolve beyond defending against false data to also prevent the misapplication of truthful but irrelevant retrieved documents.
Lazy Grounding: Attacking Search Agents with Factual Evidence
arXiv:2608.30303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Search agents reduce hallucination by grounding answers in retrieved web evidence. Yet reliance on retrieval also creates an attack surface: poisoned corpora with false or malicious documents can cause agents to reproduce misinformation. We show that falsehood is not necessary -- a search agent can be misled by factual evidence for a nearby question, adopting that nearby answer even when it does not answer the current question. We call this failure lazy grounding. We expose lazy grounding using nearby evidence from answer-changing rewrites of benchmark questions. Each document truthfully supports a neighboring rewritten question, but is surfaced for the original question. Across 12 model-benchmark pairs, nearby evidence reduces accuracy by 5.9 points on average and by up to 17.3 points, while inducing nearby-answer adoption in every setting. The effect is stronger when nearby evidence appears later or is more answer-shaped. Our results show that robust search agents must defend against not only misinformation but also the misapplication of factual evidence. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/frankyzha/lazy-grounding.
Abstract:Search agents reduce hallucination by grounding answers in retrieved web evidence. Yet reliance on retrieval also creates an attack surface: poisoned corpora with false or malicious documents can cause agents to reproduce misinformation. We show that falsehood is not necessary -- a search agent can be misled by factual evidence for a nearby question, adopting that nearby answer even when it does not answer the current question. We call this failure lazy grounding. We expose lazy grounding using nearby evidence from answer-changing rewrites of benchmark questions. Each document truthfully supports a neighboring rewritten question, but is surfaced for the original question. Across 12 model-benchmark pairs, nearby evidence reduces accuracy by 5.9 points on average and by up to 17.3 points, while inducing nearby-answer adoption in every setting. The effect is stronger when nearby evidence appears later or is more answer-shaped. Our results show that robust search agents must defend against not only misinformation but also the misapplication of factual evidence. The code is publicly available at this https URL.
Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference). Code: this https URL
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.30303 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.30303v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30303 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
AgentSnare: Learning to Delay, Divert, and Defuse Autonomous Penetration Agents
arXiv · Jul 30, 2026
Construct validity of Claude Opus 4.8's System Card – A commentary
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

[AINews] Claude Opus 5.5, the new default model for AINews — and everybody cuts prices 40-50%
Latent Space · Sep 23, 2026