Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates how positional bias manifests internally across transformer layers in short-context settings, revealing distinct patterns where function words favor recent tokens while content words rely on earlier ones. By isolating these structural behaviors from external task pressures, the study provides critical insights into the fundamental mechanics of language model representations independent of long-sequence performance metrics.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Layer-wise Positional Bias in Short-Context Language Modeling

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.04098v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Transformer language models systematically prefer tokens at specific input positions regardless of semantic relevance---a phenomenon known as positional bias. Prior work characterizes this bias in model behavior through performance drops in long-context tasks or in model architecture through attention-based analyses. However, it remains unmeasured how input positions actually drive predictions layer by layer. We introduce a layer conductance framework within a sliding-window design, applied to short-context next-word prediction to isolate model-internal behavior from task and context-window pressure. The resulting layer-wise positional importance profiles are stable across diverse texts and lexical scrambling, confirming they reflect model-internal structure. Characterizing how these profiles evolve across depth, we find recency bias increases monotonically while primacy bias is subtle and diminishes. We also find that this positional bias is not uniform across word types: function words exhibit higher recency bias while content words show higher primacy bias.

Abstract:Transformer language models systematically prefer tokens at specific input positions regardless of semantic relevance---a phenomenon known as positional bias. Prior work characterizes this bias in model behavior through performance drops in long-context tasks or in model architecture through attention-based analyses. However, it remains unmeasured how input positions actually drive predictions layer by layer. We introduce a layer conductance framework within a sliding-window design, applied to short-context next-word prediction to isolate model-internal behavior from task and context-window pressure. The resulting layer-wise positional importance profiles are stable across diverse texts and lexical scrambling, confirming they reflect model-internal structure. Characterizing how these profiles evolve across depth, we find recency bias increases monotonically while primacy bias is subtle and diminishes. We also find that this positional bias is not uniform across word types: function words exhibit higher recency bias while content words show higher primacy bias.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2601.04098 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2601.04098v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.04098 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 238 words

Related coverage