aiqbench analysis
Lattice introduces a confidence-gated hybrid architecture that selectively activates behavioral archetype scoring only when validation-calibrated thresholds are met, otherwise defaulting to backbone predictions. This approach yields statistically significant improvements in Hit Rate@10 on MovieLens and cross-domain validation on Amazon Electronics while explicitly avoiding claims of maximizing pooled accuracy. The system prioritizes controlled effect estimation and distribution shift robustness, with implementation details currently held behind patent prosecution.
Lattice: A Confidence-Gated Hybrid System for Uncertainty-Aware Sequential Prediction with Behavioral Archetypes
arXiv:2601.15423v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce Lattice, a hybrid sequential prediction system that conditionally activates learned behavioral structure using binary confidence gating. The system summarizes behavior windows as behavioral archetypes and activates archetype-based scoring only when an in-support confidence signal exceeds a validation-calibrated threshold, falling back to backbone predictions when uncertain. Our primary estimand is the controlled effect of adding Lattice to a fixed backbone on identical test rows. On MovieLens (30 paired seeds, full-catalog ranking), LSTM+Lattice improves HR@10 by +31.7% (gated) versus the LSTM backbone alone (p much less than 10^-20); ungated fusion reaches +58.7% on the same protocol. We do not claim gating maximizes pooled accuracy. With backbone-native archetypes (fit in each backbone's embedding space), gated lifts of +13.3% (transformer) and +17.0% (SASRec) hold under the same evaluation design. A prior approximately 0% transformer row in version 1 reflected an invalid cross-backbone transfer, not evidence that composition cannot help stronger encoders. Amazon Electronics provides supporting cross-domain evidence (+124.0% gated, 15 seeds, high variance). Controlled shift checks (appendix) illustrate gate refusal under distribution shift. Standalone SASRec and BERT4Rec scores are contextual references, not the target estimand. We report what composition achieves and when it activates; production calibration and implementation details remain proprietary pending patent prosecution.
Abstract:We introduce Lattice, a hybrid sequential prediction system that conditionally activates learned behavioral structure using binary confidence gating. The system summarizes behavior windows as behavioral archetypes and activates archetype-based scoring only when an in-support confidence signal exceeds a validation-calibrated threshold, falling back to backbone predictions when uncertain. Our primary estimand is the controlled effect of adding Lattice to a fixed backbone on identical test rows. On MovieLens (30 paired seeds, full-catalog ranking), LSTM+Lattice improves HR@10 by +31.7% (gated) versus the LSTM backbone alone (p much less than 10^-20); ungated fusion reaches +58.7% on the same protocol. We do not claim gating maximizes pooled accuracy. With backbone-native archetypes (fit in each backbone's embedding space), gated lifts of +13.3% (transformer) and +17.0% (SASRec) hold under the same evaluation design. A prior approximately 0% transformer row in version 1 reflected an invalid cross-backbone transfer, not evidence that composition cannot help stronger encoders. Amazon Electronics provides supporting cross-domain evidence (+124.0% gated, 15 seeds, high variance). Controlled shift checks (appendix) illustrate gate refusal under distribution shift. Standalone SASRec and BERT4Rec scores are contextual references, not the target estimand. We report what composition achieves and when it activates; production calibration and implementation details remain proprietary pending patent prosecution.
v2 (May 2026): Corrected primary estimand; removed misleading SOTA comparisons; backbone-native transformer/SASRec results; gated vs ungated trade-off; IP-conscious reporting; LIGO/finance demoted to appendix. 11 pages, 1 figure. Patent pending. Contact: LorianBannis@banlys.com for benchmark access
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2601.15423 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2601.15423v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words
Related coverage

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

The Two-Century Path That Made Quantum Computing Inevitable
Quantum Computing Report · Sep 28, 2026

The Companies Building Quantum Computing Chips in 2026
The Quantum Insider · Jun 5, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026