Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper advances the theoretical understanding of Random Reshuffling SGD by establishing convergence guarantees for the final iterate without requiring step sizes inversely proportional to the dataset size. By retaining sampling bias, the authors achieve a constant component stepsize that matches averaged-iterate rates up to logarithmic factors, offering practical implications for large-scale optimization in machine learning.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Large-Step Last-Iterate Convergence of Random-Reshuffling Stochastic Gradient Descent

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.19444v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Random reshuffling stochastic gradient descent (RR-SGD) is widely used for finite-sum optimization in machine learning. For convex $L$-smooth components, recent work establishes convergence guarantees for an averaged iterate with component stepsizes as large as order $1/L$. However, the final iterate is a natural output in practice, and existing last-iterate guarantees in this setting require stepsizes that scale inversely with the number of components $n$. We establish an expected objective-gap bound for the last iterate of standard RR-SGD on unconstrained problems with a constant component stepsize satisfying $0<\eta\lesssim 1/(L(1 + \log(nK)))$, where $K$ is the number of epochs. By retaining the sampling bias at random comparison points, we remove the explicit $1/n$ factor from the stepsize restriction. Combined with existing small-step bounds, our result matches the corresponding averaged-iterate convergence rate up to logarithmic factors.

Abstract:Random reshuffling stochastic gradient descent (RR-SGD) is widely used for finite-sum optimization in machine learning. For convex $L$-smooth components, recent work establishes convergence guarantees for an averaged iterate with component stepsizes as large as order $1/L$. However, the final iterate is a natural output in practice, and existing last-iterate guarantees in this setting require stepsizes that scale inversely with the number of components $n$. We establish an expected objective-gap bound for the last iterate of standard RR-SGD on unconstrained problems with a constant component stepsize satisfying $0<\eta\lesssim 1/(L(1 + \log(nK)))$, where $K$ is the number of epochs. By retaining the sampling bias at random comparison points, we remove the explicit $1/n$ factor from the stepsize restriction. Combined with existing small-step bounds, our result matches the corresponding averaged-iterate convergence rate up to logarithmic factors.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2610.19444 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2610.19444v1 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19444 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words

Related coverage