aiqbench analysis
This research introduces LLM-Falsifier, a novel framework that leverages large language models to optimize robustness searches for cyber-physical systems, significantly outperforming traditional black-box algorithms on standard benchmarks. By integrating semantic information such as natural-language inputs and critical-time witnesses, the approach demonstrates that LLMs can act as efficient falsifiers for formal specifications in safety-critical applications.
Large Language Models as Falsifiers for Cyber-Physical Systems
arXiv:2609.20752v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Falsification searches for counterexamples to formal specifications in cyber-physical systems (CPS). With specifications written in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), falsification can be formulated as a robustness optimization problem, traditionally tackled with black-box search algorithms. In parallel, large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as surprisingly effective optimizers when coupled with iterative prompting. In this work, we connect these ideas and introduce LLM-Falsifier, an LLM-based approach that falsifies specifications by minimizing the STL robustness degree. Beyond generic prompt-based optimization, our key idea is to expose the LLM to semantic information that is natural for language models but absent from standard numerical optimizers, including natural-language input and output names, output trajectories, and critical-time witnesses for the minimum robustness value. These additions enable smarter and more sample-efficient robustness search. On the ARCH-COMP falsification benchmarks, LLM-Falsifier is shown to outperform existing falsification tools based on a range of optimization paradigms, from surrogate-based and Bayesian optimization to search-based testing, on 14 of 21 specifications when measured by the average number of simulations required to find a counterexample.
Abstract:Falsification searches for counterexamples to formal specifications in cyber-physical systems (CPS). With specifications written in Signal Temporal Logic (STL), falsification can be formulated as a robustness optimization problem, traditionally tackled with black-box search algorithms. In parallel, large language models (LLMs) have recently emerged as surprisingly effective optimizers when coupled with iterative prompting. In this work, we connect these ideas and introduce LLM-Falsifier, an LLM-based approach that falsifies specifications by minimizing the STL robustness degree. Beyond generic prompt-based optimization, our key idea is to expose the LLM to semantic information that is natural for language models but absent from standard numerical optimizers, including natural-language input and output names, output trajectories, and critical-time witnesses for the minimum robustness value. These additions enable smarter and more sample-efficient robustness search. On the ARCH-COMP falsification benchmarks, LLM-Falsifier is shown to outperform existing falsification tools based on a range of optimization paradigms, from surrogate-based and Bayesian optimization to search-based testing, on 14 of 21 specifications when measured by the average number of simulations required to find a counterexample.
Systems and Control (eess.SY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO); Software Engineering (cs.SE)
arXiv:2609.20752 [eess.SY]
(or arXiv:2609.20752v1 [eess.SY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.20752 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
Debating RSI, the US-China Gap, and Jaggedness with JS Denain of Epoch AI
Interconnects · Sep 22, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
Assessing Information Ecosystems : How Governments Can Get Ahead of Hybrid Threats
carnegieendowment.org · Aug 5, 2026