Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper establishes a rigorous mathematical framework for large language models, grounding their architecture in information theory, probability, and optimization to better analyze accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. By formalizing the next-token prediction mechanism, it offers researchers a theoretical platform to develop novel methodologies beyond empirical trial-and-error. This work bridges pure mathematics with practical AI deployment, providing essential insights for advancing foundational model understanding.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Frontiers, AI Alignment Forum
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Large Language Models: A Mathematical Formulation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.22170v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) process and predict sequences containing text to answer questions, and address tasks including document summarization, providing recommendations, writing software and solving quantitative problems. We provide a mathematical framework for LLMs by describing the encoding of text sequences into sequences of tokens, defining the architecture for next-token prediction models, explaining how these models are learned from data, and demonstrating how they are deployed to address a variety of tasks. The mathematical sophistication required to understand this material is not high, and relies on straightforward ideas from information theory, probability and optimization. Nonetheless, the combination of ideas resting on these different components from the mathematical sciences yields a complex algorithmic structure; and this algorithmic structure has demonstrated remarkable empirical successes. The mathematical framework established here provides a platform from which it is possible to formulate and address questions concerning the accuracy, efficiency and robustness of the algorithms that constitute LLMs. The framework also suggests directions for development of modified and new methodologies.

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) process and predict sequences containing text to answer questions, and address tasks including document summarization, providing recommendations, writing software and solving quantitative problems. We provide a mathematical framework for LLMs by describing the encoding of text sequences into sequences of tokens, defining the architecture for next-token prediction models, explaining how these models are learned from data, and demonstrating how they are deployed to address a variety of tasks. The mathematical sophistication required to understand this material is not high, and relies on straightforward ideas from information theory, probability and optimization. Nonetheless, the combination of ideas resting on these different components from the mathematical sciences yields a complex algorithmic structure; and this algorithmic structure has demonstrated remarkable empirical successes. The mathematical framework established here provides a platform from which it is possible to formulate and address questions concerning the accuracy, efficiency and robustness of the algorithms that constitute LLMs. The framework also suggests directions for development of modified and new methodologies.

Numerical Analysis (math.NA); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2601.22170 [math.NA]

(or arXiv:2601.22170v2 [math.NA] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.22170 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words

Related coverage