aiqbench analysis
This study introduces a specialized multilingual financial QA system that leverages language-routed model selection and direct option scoring to handle structured domain reasoning across five languages. The research highlights critical performance asymmetries, demonstrating how standard chain-of-thought prompting can catastrophically degrade accuracy in specific low-resource contexts like Greek. For practitioners building enterprise RAG pipelines, the findings underscore the necessity of tailoring retrieval strategies and inference modes rather than applying uniform prompts globally.
Language-Routed RAG and Direct Option Scoring for Multilingual Financial QA: DS@GT at FinMMEval
arXiv:2607.22841v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present DS@GT's submission to FinMMEval 2026 Task 1, a multilingual financial exam question answering benchmark spanning English, Spanish, Greek, Chinese, and Hindi. Financial certification exams such as the CFA, EFPA, and CPA demand structured domain reasoning that standard NLP benchmarks do not capture, and this challenge compounds across languages where retrieval and representation infrastructure is underdeveloped. We build a retrieval-augmented pipeline on LangGraph that detects query language and retrieves semantically relevant exemplars from a 30,209-entry multilingual knowledge base using BGE-M3 embeddings and FAISS indexing. The system then scores answers via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Scoring (RADS), reading next-token log-probabilities over candidate option letters rather than generating free-form output. For low-resource languages, we fuse per-language and cross-lingual retrieval indices using weighted Reciprocal Rank Fusion. Model selection is language-routed: Qwen3-14B for Arabic, Chinese, and Hindi; Qwen2.5-14B for English; and Llama-3.1-8B for Greek, a routing derived from empirical ablations that reveal substantial language-asymmetric performance gaps. Notably, chain-of-thought prompting significantly degrades Greek accuracy (90.7% to 20.9%), and enabling Qwen3's default thinking mode collapses Arabic RADS performance to near-chance levels. Our results indicate that effective multilingual financial reasoning requires language-aware retrieval, model routing, and deliberate scoring strategy selection.
Abstract:We present DS@GT's submission to FinMMEval 2026 Task 1, a multilingual financial exam question answering benchmark spanning English, Spanish, Greek, Chinese, and Hindi. Financial certification exams such as the CFA, EFPA, and CPA demand structured domain reasoning that standard NLP benchmarks do not capture, and this challenge compounds across languages where retrieval and representation infrastructure is underdeveloped. We build a retrieval-augmented pipeline on LangGraph that detects query language and retrieves semantically relevant exemplars from a 30,209-entry multilingual knowledge base using BGE-M3 embeddings and FAISS indexing. The system then scores answers via Retrieval-Augmented Direct Scoring (RADS), reading next-token log-probabilities over candidate option letters rather than generating free-form output. For low-resource languages, we fuse per-language and cross-lingual retrieval indices using weighted Reciprocal Rank Fusion. Model selection is language-routed: Qwen3-14B for Arabic, Chinese, and Hindi; Qwen2.5-14B for English; and Llama-3.1-8B for Greek, a routing derived from empirical ablations that reveal substantial language-asymmetric performance gaps. Notably, chain-of-thought prompting significantly degrades Greek accuracy (90.7% to 20.9%), and enabling Qwen3's default thinking mode collapses Arabic RADS performance to near-chance levels. Our results indicate that effective multilingual financial reasoning requires language-aware retrieval, model routing, and deliberate scoring strategy selection.
Accepted for publication in the CLEF 2026 Working Notes. 15 pages, 3 figures
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.22841 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2607.22841v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22841 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026
Overview of FinMMEval 2026 Task 1: Multilingual Financial Multiple-Choice Question Answering
arXiv · Jul 23, 2026
Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: Customizable Multimodal Safety for Global Enterprise AI
Hugging Face · Jun 4, 2026