aiqbench analysis
This research applies language models to solve a specific evaluation problem in e-commerce search by predicting the impact of page-level layout changes without costly online A/B testing. The study demonstrates that representation-based methods using these models outperform direct prompting for assessing user engagement, offering a scalable offline solution for optimizing recommender system modules.
Language Models for Page-Level Layout Decisions in E-commerce Search
arXiv:2610.10920v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: E-commerce search pages are critical touchpoints for millions of online shoppers. While traditional search engines return a ranked list of results, modern E-commerce search pages increasingly incorporate recommender system modules -- for example, secondary stacks that surface alternative product groupings at specific positions. When introduced appropriately, secondary stacks can improve user engagement; however, suboptimal placement may disrupt browsing flow and degrade the primary results. Unlike traditional search ranking, where evaluation techniques such as interleaving are well established, evaluating page-level layout changes e.g., when and where to insert a secondary stack remains challenging without costly online A/B testing. To address this, we study offline methods for evaluating whether a given layout decision -- specifically, the inclusion of a secondary stack at a particular position -- is beneficial to users. We investigate language models as scalable evaluators by comparing direct prompt-based, prompt-derived feature, and representation-based methods. Our results show that representation-based approaches consistently outperform prompt-based judging in predicting user engagement, suggesting they provide a reliable foundation for offline layout evaluation in E-commerce search.
Abstract:E-commerce search pages are critical touchpoints for millions of online shoppers. While traditional search engines return a ranked list of results, modern E-commerce search pages increasingly incorporate recommender system modules -- for example, secondary stacks that surface alternative product groupings at specific positions. When introduced appropriately, secondary stacks can improve user engagement; however, suboptimal placement may disrupt browsing flow and degrade the primary results. Unlike traditional search ranking, where evaluation techniques such as interleaving are well established, evaluating page-level layout changes e.g., when and where to insert a secondary stack remains challenging without costly online A/B testing. To address this, we study offline methods for evaluating whether a given layout decision -- specifically, the inclusion of a secondary stack at a particular position -- is beneficial to users. We investigate language models as scalable evaluators by comparing direct prompt-based, prompt-derived feature, and representation-based methods. Our results show that representation-based approaches consistently outperform prompt-based judging in predicting user engagement, suggesting they provide a reliable foundation for offline layout evaluation in E-commerce search.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2610.10920 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.10920v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.10920 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words
Related coverage

Presentation: Automating the Web With MCP: Infra That Doesn’t Break
InfoQ · Jun 16, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Built Technologies builds an AI-powered document intelligence solution on AWS to power agents across real estate finance
AWS · Jul 15, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026