Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical data alignment challenge in sports analytics by developing a modeling framework that correctly distinguishes session-level injury outcomes from high-frequency monitoring data. By avoiding the assumption of minute-by-minute injury status, the study provides a more robust statistical approach for analyzing athlete health trajectories using standard machine learning benchmarks like Logistic Regression and XGBoost. While the application is specific to football, the methodological contribution regarding temporal mismatch in supervised learning offers relevant insights for broader AI applications in longitudinal health monitoring.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Landmark-Based Discrimination of Injury-Associated Athlete-Sessions from Minute-Resolution Multimodal Football Monitoring Data

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.03790v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Athlete monitoring data may be recorded minute by minute throughout a match or training session, while injury information may only indicate whether the entire session was injury-associated. This creates a modelling problem: assigning the same session-level label to every minute would imply that injury status is known at each exact time, even though within-session injury onset is unknown. Our novelty is a fixed-landmark, one-representation-per-athlete-session formulation that directly addresses this mismatch. Instead of labelling every minute, we construct one representation per athlete-session at each landmark using information observed up to that point. This keeps the target at the session level and avoids unsupported minute-level injury supervision. A landmark is a fixed time point within the same session, such as 10, 20, or 30 minutes. At each landmark, we assess whether the whole session is injury-associated or non-injury-associated and examine how discrimination changes as more within-session information becomes available. Using 2020 SoccerMon data, we analyse 3,743 athlete-sessions from 48 elite women's football athletes, including 22 injury-associated sessions from five athletes. We evaluate pre-session, cumulative, dynamic, and combined representations with athlete-disjoint validation, athlete-cluster bootstrap uncertainty, common-cohort sensitivity analysis, alternative negative-athlete fold allocations, equal-athlete weighting, and Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost benchmarks. Primary CUM+DYN Logistic Regression yields ROC-AUC 0.367-0.607 and PR-AUC 0.0080-0.0150 across landmarks, with wide uncertainty. PRE-containing representations show higher point estimates at several landmarks but remain uncertain.

Abstract:Athlete monitoring data may be recorded minute by minute throughout a match or training session, while injury information may only indicate whether the entire session was injury-associated. This creates a modelling problem: assigning the same session-level label to every minute would imply that injury status is known at each exact time, even though within-session injury onset is unknown. Our novelty is a fixed-landmark, one-representation-per-athlete-session formulation that directly addresses this mismatch. Instead of labelling every minute, we construct one representation per athlete-session at each landmark using information observed up to that point. This keeps the target at the session level and avoids unsupported minute-level injury supervision. A landmark is a fixed time point within the same session, such as 10, 20, or 30 minutes. At each landmark, we assess whether the whole session is injury-associated or non-injury-associated and examine how discrimination changes as more within-session information becomes available. Using 2020 SoccerMon data, we analyse 3,743 athlete-sessions from 48 elite women's football athletes, including 22 injury-associated sessions from five athletes. We evaluate pre-session, cumulative, dynamic, and combined representations with athlete-disjoint validation, athlete-cluster bootstrap uncertainty, common-cohort sensitivity analysis, alternative negative-athlete fold allocations, equal-athlete weighting, and Logistic Regression, Random Forest, and XGBoost benchmarks. Primary CUM+DYN Logistic Regression yields ROC-AUC 0.367-0.607 and PR-AUC 0.0080-0.0150 across landmarks, with wide uncertainty. PRE-containing representations show higher point estimates at several landmarks but remain uncertain.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.03790 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.03790v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03790 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 320 words

Related coverage