aiqbench analysis
LakeQuest introduces a critical new benchmark for evaluating AI systems on unstructured, heterogeneous data lakes rather than clean datasets. The study reveals that current Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic methods fail at relation chaining in metadata graphs and cross-modal synthesis despite high-quality retrieval. This work is essential for researchers developing robust QA pipelines capable of reasoning over real-world enterprise and scientific information architectures.
LakeQuest: A Three-Domain Benchmark for Grounded Question Answering across Data Lakes
arXiv:2607.12310v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While modern question answering (QA) systems excel on clean, schema-aligned corpora, real-world knowledge is rarely so neatly packaged. Answering questions over enterprise and scientific data lakes requires systems to navigate heterogeneous, weakly structured collections of tables, passages, and linked metadata. Current benchmarks abstract away this noisy discovery process, failing to evaluate end-to-end performance. To bridge this gap, we introduce LakeQuest, a human-validated benchmark of 9,846 QA pairs designed to evaluate the end-to-end retrieve-and-synthesize pipeline over realistic data lakes. LakeQuest spans three diverse domains (AI/ML metadata, retail banking, and multimodal biomedical drug information) and pairs every question with exact, modality-aware evidence pointers. By isolating source discovery from cross-modal synthesis, LakeQuest exposes critical failure modes in modern QA systems. Our baseline evaluations, including standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic tool-use methods, reveal that high-quality retrieval does not guarantee correct reasoning. Systems consistently struggle with relation chaining in metadata graphs, policy grounding in bank ledgers, and joint tabular QA in biomedical contexts, highlighting the need for robust discovery and faithful cross-file composition mechanisms in future agentic QA systems.
Abstract:While modern question answering (QA) systems excel on clean, schema-aligned corpora, real-world knowledge is rarely so neatly packaged. Answering questions over enterprise and scientific data lakes requires systems to navigate heterogeneous, weakly structured collections of tables, passages, and linked metadata. Current benchmarks abstract away this noisy discovery process, failing to evaluate end-to-end performance. To bridge this gap, we introduce LakeQuest, a human-validated benchmark of 9,846 QA pairs designed to evaluate the end-to-end retrieve-and-synthesize pipeline over realistic data lakes. LakeQuest spans three diverse domains (AI/ML metadata, retail banking, and multimodal biomedical drug information) and pairs every question with exact, modality-aware evidence pointers. By isolating source discovery from cross-modal synthesis, LakeQuest exposes critical failure modes in modern QA systems. Our baseline evaluations, including standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic tool-use methods, reveal that high-quality retrieval does not guarantee correct reasoning. Systems consistently struggle with relation chaining in metadata graphs, policy grounding in bank ledgers, and joint tabular QA in biomedical contexts, highlighting the need for robust discovery and faithful cross-file composition mechanisms in future agentic QA systems.
24 pages, 4 figures, 18 tables. Accepted at the Conference on Language Modeling (COLM) 2026
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
I.2.7; H.3.3; H.2.8
arXiv:2607.12310 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.12310v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.12310 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 289 words
Related coverage
Article: Your Next DSL Author is a Language Model
InfoQ · Sep 16, 2026

Presentation: Building Evals for AI Adoption: from Principles to Practice
InfoQ · May 29, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026

Why do models *really* fail on HLE tasks?
LessWrong · Sep 28, 2026