aiqbench analysis
The paper builds a 983M-parameter model from scratch on pre-modern Chinese texts and tests whether its knowledge really stops at a chosen date. Its main lesson is about data provenance: a common dating heuristic left twentieth-century material in the corpus, and an audit still found later contamination. The authors also say the probe reflects source coverage rather than a single cutoff year, so readers should treat the "1840" label as approximate.
L\"ushi-1840: Building and Probing a Knowledge Cutoff for a Classical Chinese Language Model
arXiv:2610.16201v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Language models trained only on text from before a given year are useful for studying hindsight and historical language, but the open collections of pre-modern Chinese carry no publication dates and unreliable dynasty labels. We present L\"ushi-1840, a 983M-parameter model trained from scratch on 12,262 books (1.28B characters) selected as composed before 1840. A first corpus, dated by a common heuristic, in effect ended at 1644 while containing twentieth-century material. We describe the re-dating and cleaning pipeline that replaced it and an audit with markers the pipeline did not use, which still finds later material. On the model side we measure surprisal, relative to a modern reference, on annals compiled after the cutoff. For events after 1840 against events up to 1820 the ratio is 1.38 (95% interval 1.33-1.44), against about 1.00 for modern general-purpose models. In a series of 294M models, adding the later court records lowers the ratio from 1.33 to 1.16, and the two models diverge from the 1820s, where the added records begin. The probe tracks the coverage of sources and does not establish a single cutoff year; none of our probes exposes the audited contamination. Model, book list and scripts will be released.
Abstract:Language models trained only on text from before a given year are useful for studying hindsight and historical language, but the open collections of pre-modern Chinese carry no publication dates and unreliable dynasty labels. We present Lüshi-1840, a 983M-parameter model trained from scratch on 12,262 books (1.28B characters) selected as composed before 1840. A first corpus, dated by a common heuristic, in effect ended at 1644 while containing twentieth-century material. We describe the re-dating and cleaning pipeline that replaced it and an audit with markers the pipeline did not use, which still finds later material. On the model side we measure surprisal, relative to a modern reference, on annals compiled after the cutoff. For events after 1840 against events up to 1820 the ratio is 1.38 (95% interval 1.33-1.44), against about 1.00 for modern general-purpose models. In a series of 294M models, adding the later court records lowers the ratio from 1.33 to 1.16, and the two models diverge from the 1820s, where the added records begin. The probe tracks the coverage of sources and does not establish a single cutoff year; none of our probes exposes the audited contamination. Model, book list and scripts will be released.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.16201 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.16201v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16201 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 293 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

The death of humanity
Fortune · Oct 16, 2026

AI and Quantum Computing Briefing
livetradingnews.com · Aug 4, 2026