aiqbench analysis
Lévy Attention introduces a stochastic formulation for continuous-time attention that inherently quantifies prediction uncertainty without additional computational overhead or trained heads. By leveraging an inhomogeneous Poisson random measure, the method preserves evidence and disagreement metrics discarded by standard softmax layers to provide calibrated trust scores for irregular time-series data. This approach offers a significant efficiency gain over multi-pass Monte Carlo dropout while maintaining competitive accuracy on sparse datasets.
L\'evy Attention: Single-Pass Predictive Uncertainty for Continuous-Time Attention
arXiv:2608.19171v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep models for irregularly-sampled time series answer queries at arbitrary continuous timestamps, yet report nothing about how far each answer should be trusted. We show the attention layer itself can close that gap: with the right stochastic formulation, the pass that makes each prediction also reports, in closed form and at no extra cost, how far it should be trusted. We introduce L\'evy Attention, a cross-attention operator whose output is a stochastic integral against an inhomogeneous Poisson random measure: query-key compatibilities assemble an intensity over a continuous (time x channel) index space, the measure scatters atoms under it, and the output averages an interpolated value field at those atoms. In expectation it reduces to a mollified cosine-kernel attention, so it replaces a softmax layer and trains with exact gradients. What softmax discards, the Poisson construction preserves in closed form: the evidence $\Lambda_q$ (total compatibility mass) and the disagreement $\mathrm{tr}\,\Sigma_V(q)$ (value spread). An exact variance identity makes their combination $\hat\sigma(q)=\sqrt{\mathrm{tr}\,\Sigma_V(q)\,\varphi(\Lambda_q)}$ the root-mean-square deviation of the sampled operator, emitted by the deterministic pass with no trained head. Empirically, disagreement carries the signal, while the evidence factor swings from uninformative on dense data to strongly informative on sparse. On t-PatchGNN the operator swap costs at most 5.6% accuracy against a matched control and nothing on the sparsest dataset. The free disagreement signal improves on 20-pass MC dropout across matched five-seed suites, and $\hat\sigma$ scales a calibrated Gaussian whose zero-sample CRPS beats a fifty-draw sampler; a split-conformal wrapper reaches nominal coverage at every level, and one pass ranks 3,383 unseen patients by trust in 1.4 seconds.
Abstract:Deep models for irregularly-sampled time series answer queries at arbitrary continuous timestamps, yet report nothing about how far each answer should be trusted. We show the attention layer itself can close that gap: with the right stochastic formulation, the pass that makes each prediction also reports, in closed form and at no extra cost, how far it should be trusted. We introduce Lévy Attention, a cross-attention operator whose output is a stochastic integral against an inhomogeneous Poisson random measure: query-key compatibilities assemble an intensity over a continuous (time x channel) index space, the measure scatters atoms under it, and the output averages an interpolated value field at those atoms. In expectation it reduces to a mollified cosine-kernel attention, so it replaces a softmax layer and trains with exact gradients. What softmax discards, the Poisson construction preserves in closed form: the evidence $\Lambda_q$ (total compatibility mass) and the disagreement $\mathrm{tr}\,\Sigma_V(q)$ (value spread). An exact variance identity makes their combination $\hat\sigma(q)=\sqrt{\mathrm{tr}\,\Sigma_V(q)\,\varphi(\Lambda_q)}$ the root-mean-square deviation of the sampled operator, emitted by the deterministic pass with no trained head. Empirically, disagreement carries the signal, while the evidence factor swings from uninformative on dense data to strongly informative on sparse. On t-PatchGNN the operator swap costs at most 5.6% accuracy against a matched control and nothing on the sparsest dataset. The free disagreement signal improves on 20-pass MC dropout across matched five-seed suites, and $\hat\sigma$ scales a calibrated Gaussian whose zero-sample CRPS beats a fifty-draw sampler; a split-conformal wrapper reaches nominal coverage at every level, and one pass ranks 3,383 unseen patients by trust in 1.4 seconds.
23 pages, 2 figures. Under review at TMLR
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.19171 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.19171v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19171 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 364 words
Related coverage

Deconfusing Corrigibility
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 17, 2026

The user in the LLM might be a moral patient too (a strange implication of the PSM and simulators)
LessWrong · Oct 15, 2026

Quadrillion Param Costs: KV Cache, Context Length, Frontier Margins
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Expenditure Horizon: Measuring Optimization Ability, with an Application to NanoGPT
METR · Jul 21, 2026