aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a rigorous geometric comparison between Krylov state complexity and information-geometric measures for qubit dynamics, demonstrating that they capture fundamentally distinct aspects of quantum evolution: directional spread versus effective volume explored. By formalizing these concepts in terms of curvature and trajectory efficiency, the work clarifies the complementary roles of state-based and information-geometric approaches in analyzing quantum systems. The analysis offers a theoretical framework for distinguishing between geodesic and non-geodesic paths in stationary and nonstationary Hamiltonian evolutions.
Krylov's State Complexity and Information Geometry in Qubit Dynamics
arXiv:2601.18941v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We compare Krylov's state complexity with an information-geometric (IG) measure of complexity for the quantum evolution of two-level systems. Focusing on qubit dynamics on the Bloch sphere, we analyze evolutions generated by stationary and nonstationary Hamiltonians, corresponding to geodesic and nongeodesic trajectories. We formulate Krylov complexity in geometric terms, both instantaneously and in a time-averaged sense, and contrast it with an IG complexity of quantum evolutions characterized in terms of efficiency and curvature. We show that the two measures reflect fundamentally different aspects of quantum dynamics: Krylov's state complexity quantifies the directional spread of the evolving state relative to the initial state, whereas the IG complexity captures the effective volume explored along the trajectory on the Bloch sphere. This geometric distinction explains their inequivalent behavior and highlights the complementary nature of state-based and information-geometric notions of complexity in quantum systems.
Abstract:We compare Krylov's state complexity with an information-geometric (IG) measure of complexity for the quantum evolution of two-level systems. Focusing on qubit dynamics on the Bloch sphere, we analyze evolutions generated by stationary and nonstationary Hamiltonians, corresponding to geodesic and nongeodesic trajectories. We formulate Krylov complexity in geometric terms, both instantaneously and in a time-averaged sense, and contrast it with an IG complexity of quantum evolutions characterized in terms of efficiency and curvature. We show that the two measures reflect fundamentally different aspects of quantum dynamics: Krylov's state complexity quantifies the directional spread of the evolving state relative to the initial state, whereas the IG complexity captures the effective volume explored along the trajectory on the Bloch sphere. This geometric distinction explains their inequivalent behavior and highlights the complementary nature of state-based and information-geometric notions of complexity in quantum systems.
arXiv:2601.18941 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2601.18941v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.18941 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
Eur. Phys. J. Plus 141, 639 (2026)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words
Related coverage

Krylov Complexity Saturated Beyond Heisenberg Length in Quantum Systems
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 24, 2026

Researchers Bound Relaxation Speed in Quantum Systems
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 10, 2026

A random quantum state of three qubits is not always entangled
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 14, 2026

Researchers Link Network Shape to Qubit Entanglement Decay
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 18, 2026