aiqbench analysis
This study introduces KoAGE, a novel benchmark evaluating Korean large language models on their ability to acquire, infer meaning from limited context, and generate new neologisms. The results reveal a critical gap between lexical recall and structural understanding, showing that while single models can mimic human word-formation mechanisms, multi-agent systems tend to favor abbreviations dependent on interaction framing. This work advances the field by providing the first systematic comparison of model coinages against attested community usage under original contextual constraints.
KoAGE: Do Large Language Models Know, Learn, and Coin Korean Neologisms?
arXiv:2610.19399v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Korean neologisms arise through diverse mechanisms, a demanding test of language models beyond lexical memorization. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce NeoTrace, an automated, rerunnable framework that collects and dates neologisms across genres. Its 4,271 entries support KoAGE, a cutoff-aware benchmark with three acquisition and two generation tasks---the latter, to our knowledge, the first to compare model coinages with attested neologisms under their original materials and community context. Across 21 models, lexical recall diverges from contextual inference: in a five-model temporal analysis, models define only 13-30% of cutoff-year words, yet can infer meaning from one usage. However, structural understanding remains limited: even correct definitions barely improve formation analysis of pre-cutoff neologisms. Given word-building materials, single models often follow human formation mechanisms, whereas multi-agent coinage favors abbreviation and depends on interaction framing. KoAGE thus separates what models know, learn from use, and coin.
Title:KoAGE: Do Large Language Models Know, Learn, and Coin Korean Neologisms?
Abstract:Korean neologisms arise through diverse mechanisms, a demanding test of language models beyond lexical memorization. To enable systematic evaluation, we introduce NeoTrace, an automated, rerunnable framework that collects and dates neologisms across genres. Its 4,271 entries support KoAGE, a cutoff-aware benchmark with three acquisition and two generation tasks---the latter, to our knowledge, the first to compare model coinages with attested neologisms under their original materials and community context. Across 21 models, lexical recall diverges from contextual inference: in a five-model temporal analysis, models define only 13-30% of cutoff-year words, yet can infer meaning from one usage. However, structural understanding remains limited: even correct definitions barely improve formation analysis of pre-cutoff neologisms. Given word-building materials, single models often follow human formation mechanisms, whereas multi-agent coinage favors abbreviation and depends on interaction framing. KoAGE thus separates what models know, learn from use, and coin.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.19399 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.19399v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.19399 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words
Related coverage
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

What We're Up Against: An AI Safety Crash Course
LessWrong · Sep 24, 2026

Presentation: From Models to Agents: Building Context-Aware Consumer AI at Scale at DoorDash
InfoQ · Aug 15, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026