Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces KNOWSIM, a novel evaluation framework using learned user simulators to assess how well Large Language Models calibrate information delivery against evolving cognitive states. By explicitly modeling prerequisite knowledge relationships and tracking their trajectory, the study reveals significant variations in model performance across different expertise levels that standard benchmarks miss. This work advances AI safety and alignment by providing mechanistic metrics for measuring effective human-AI collaboration on complex tasks.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist, Latent Space
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

KnowSim: Evaluating Information Calibration in LLM Assistants with User Simulators that Learn

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.17150v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: To effectively collaborate with users on knowledge-intensive tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) must perform information calibration: matching content to a user's evolving understanding and cognitive capacity. Yet user simulators used to evaluate and train LLMs do not explicitly model user knowledge so they neither produce realistic interactions across knowledge levels nor reflect how interactions unfold as that knowledge evolves. To close this gap, we introduce KNOWSIM, an evaluation framework built around a user simulator that maintains explicit knowledge states, represented as a graph of Information Units with prerequisite relationships, that evolve under update rules grounded in learning theory. KNOWSIM computes three metrics (Knowledge Gain, Delivery Calibration, Cognitive Overload) directly from the knowledge state trajectory, reflecting key mechanistic aspects of information calibration. We validate KNOWSIM against 705 human-AI sessions across two domains, stratified by knowledge level: its rankings align significantly with human judgments (73-74% sign agreement), outperforming three baseline simulators. Applied to 9 LLMs, KNOWSIM reveals that the best model shifts by user knowledge level, revealing aptitude-treatment interactions invisible to standard evaluation.

Abstract:To effectively collaborate with users on knowledge-intensive tasks, Large Language Models (LLMs) must perform information calibration: matching content to a user's evolving understanding and cognitive capacity. Yet user simulators used to evaluate and train LLMs do not explicitly model user knowledge so they neither produce realistic interactions across knowledge levels nor reflect how interactions unfold as that knowledge evolves. To close this gap, we introduce KNOWSIM, an evaluation framework built around a user simulator that maintains explicit knowledge states, represented as a graph of Information Units with prerequisite relationships, that evolve under update rules grounded in learning theory. KNOWSIM computes three metrics (Knowledge Gain, Delivery Calibration, Cognitive Overload) directly from the knowledge state trajectory, reflecting key mechanistic aspects of information calibration. We validate KNOWSIM against 705 human-AI sessions across two domains, stratified by knowledge level: its rankings align significantly with human judgments (73-74% sign agreement), outperforming three baseline simulators. Applied to 9 LLMs, KNOWSIM reveals that the best model shifts by user knowledge level, revealing aptitude-treatment interactions invisible to standard evaluation.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

arXiv:2608.17150 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.17150v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.17150 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words

Related coverage