Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the "encoding-grounding gap" in vision-language models, revealing that spatial information encoded in hidden states often fails to influence final answers until mid-to-deep network depths. The study demonstrates that text-based chain-of-thought reasoning can suppress immediate object-word transport, whereas visually grounded prompts maintain this causal pathway more effectively. These findings provide critical insights into the internal mechanics of VLMs and how architectural depth or prompting strategies affect the reliability of spatial reasoning.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Knowing Isn't Always Saying: When Do Spatial Encodings Reach Answers in Vision-Language Models?

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.22916v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models are known to encode spatial information in their hidden states, yet often fail to use it when answering. However, it remains unclear when and where this encoded information reaches the answer. We address this with direction patching, a class-conditioned causal intervention applied across layers, token positions, and prompt formats. Using spatial-ID directions constructed following prior encoding evidence, we find that causal influence on answer logits emerges only at mid-to-deep depths. Text chain-of-thought suppresses immediate object-word argmax-level transport in most models, while visually grounded prompts keep it open. Positive target-logit gain can remain below the argmax threshold, and transport can re-emerge at the final prefix token or at the answer step in deeper layers. Across the ten VLMs we study, these local effects form descriptive transport patterns. Complementary experiments characterize how these patterns shift across datasets, attributes, and encoding amplitudes. Together, these results reframe the encoding-grounding gap as a problem of conditional transport in VLMs.

Title:Knowing Isn't Always Saying: When Do Spatial Encodings Reach Answers in Vision-Language Models?

Abstract:Vision-language models are known to encode spatial information in their hidden states, yet often fail to use it when answering. However, it remains unclear when and where this encoded information reaches the answer. We address this with direction patching, a class-conditioned causal intervention applied across layers, token positions, and prompt formats. Using spatial-ID directions constructed following prior encoding evidence, we find that causal influence on answer logits emerges only at mid-to-deep depths. Text chain-of-thought suppresses immediate object-word argmax-level transport in most models, while visually grounded prompts keep it open. Positive target-logit gain can remain below the argmax threshold, and transport can re-emerge at the final prefix token or at the answer step in deeper layers. Across the ten VLMs we study, these local effects form descriptive transport patterns. Complementary experiments characterize how these patterns shift across datasets, attributes, and encoding amplitudes. Together, these results reframe the encoding-grounding gap as a problem of conditional transport in VLMs.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2608.22916 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.22916v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.22916 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words

Related coverage