aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a fundamental limitation in dual-encoder vision-language models where they fail to distinguish between the presence and absence of specific objects, such as confusing "a cat without a dog" with "a cat with a dog." The authors introduce Know-Thy-Not (KTN), a training-free technique that adds an image-side rejection dimension to directly penalize negated concepts in visual representations, significantly improving performance on the new COCO-Confusion benchmark.
Know-Thy-Not: Training-Free Targeted Negation in Dual-Encoder Vision-Language Models
arXiv:2610.17440v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Dual-encoder vision-language models systematically fail at negation, scoring ''a cat without a dog'' nearly identically to ''a cat with a dog.'' We show that this failure is inherent to the single-embedding framework. Under contrastive training, single-embedding methods can at best ignore the negated concept (dilution) but never penalize its presence (rejection). We propose Know-Thy-Not (KTN), a training-free method that introduces an image-side rejection dimension to penalize the negated concept directly in the visual representation. We also introduce COCO-Confusion, the first benchmark requiring genuine rejection to succeed. Across 9 backbones, KTN improves COCO-Confusion mAP by up to +25.6 over vanilla VLMs and +9.6 over the strongest existing method.
Abstract:Dual-encoder vision-language models systematically fail at negation, scoring ''a cat without a dog'' nearly identically to ''a cat with a dog.'' We show that this failure is inherent to the single-embedding framework. Under contrastive training, single-embedding methods can at best ignore the negated concept (dilution) but never penalize its presence (rejection). We propose Know-Thy-Not (KTN), a training-free method that introduces an image-side rejection dimension to penalize the negated concept directly in the visual representation. We also introduce COCO-Confusion, the first benchmark requiring genuine rejection to succeed. Across 9 backbones, KTN improves COCO-Confusion mAP by up to +25.6 over vanilla VLMs and +9.6 over the strongest existing method.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.17440 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2610.17440v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17440 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 207 words
Related coverage
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026

Handling Imbalanced Classification: What Works Better Than SMOTE
Analytics Vidhya · Jul 12, 2026

Skydio CEO Adam Bry on why Silicon Valley shouldn’t draw red lines for drone use
The Verge · Jun 15, 2026