Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

Kepler introduces an open-source framework for auditable world models that validates AI agents by checking hypotheses against observed transitions and predictions, rather than relying solely on final scores. This approach significantly reduces token costs and computational waste while exposing critical evaluation failures like autonomous repair masking broken planners. The work advances the field of interpretable agent behavior by demonstrating that animation frames often contain task-relevant information missed by standard text-based grids.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Kepler: Auditable World Models for ARC-AGI-3

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.00834v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: ARC-AGI-3 evaluates agents in interactive environments whose rules and objectives must be inferred from observation. We present Kepler, an open-source harness that represents hypotheses as executable world models and validates them through retrospective transition checks and conditional prediction checks. Under one frozen Claude Opus 5 configuration, Kepler obtained a server-verified 100.00 RHAE on all 25 public games, with no per-game model selection or score-conditioned reruns. On 181 of 183 completed levels, the final Opus attempt used no more actions than the corresponding median-human baseline. The retained board runs used 8,256 environment actions, of which 7,292 occurred in scored levels. Retained local provider-session records yield 858.0 million tokens, 97.37% cache reads, and a \$777.72 cost at September 1, 2026 API list-equivalent rates. We also report three evaluation failures: source-code leakage that produced an invalid perfect run, agents reconstructing a removed harness in a control condition, and autonomous repair masking a broken planner. A single-game observation case study showed that animation frames contained task-relevant information absent from settled text grids. Across the final Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol boards, 48 of 50 game-model cells reached 100. These results indicate that public-set score alone has limited discriminative value and motivate first-attempt, cost-conditioned, and verification-aware reporting.

Abstract:ARC-AGI-3 evaluates agents in interactive environments whose rules and objectives must be inferred from observation. We present Kepler, an open-source harness that represents hypotheses as executable world models and validates them through retrospective transition checks and conditional prediction checks. Under one frozen Claude Opus 5 configuration, Kepler obtained a server-verified 100.00 RHAE on all 25 public games, with no per-game model selection or score-conditioned reruns. On 181 of 183 completed levels, the final Opus attempt used no more actions than the corresponding median-human baseline. The retained board runs used 8,256 environment actions, of which 7,292 occurred in scored levels. Retained local provider-session records yield 858.0 million tokens, 97.37% cache reads, and a \$777.72 cost at September 1, 2026 API list-equivalent rates. We also report three evaluation failures: source-code leakage that produced an invalid perfect run, agents reconstructing a removed harness in a control condition, and autonomous repair masking a broken planner. A single-game observation case study showed that animation frames contained task-relevant information absent from settled text grids. Across the final Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol boards, 48 of 50 game-model cells reached 100. These results indicate that public-set score alone has limited discriminative value and motivate first-attempt, cost-conditioned, and verification-aware reporting.

17 pages. Accepted to the non-archival Interpreting Agent Behavior workshop at NeurIPS 2026. Project: this https URL . Code and public traces available

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)

arXiv:2610.00834 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.00834v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00834 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage