aiqbench analysis
A senior scientific official's skepticism about near-term quantum advantage carries weight, but it is one opinion in an unsettled debate, not a measured result. Readers should separate the claim that quantum machines lack a clear advantage on many tasks from the broader question of investment cycles, which the article also raises. The strongest signal here is the gap between qubit counts and commercial returns, which is the metric to watch for real progress.
RAS President Doubts Quantum Computers Will Soon Defeat Classical Ones. Or Does Not Believe in It at All
RAS President Expresses Doubt About Quantum Computers Overtaking Classical Ones Soon. Or Doesn't Believe in It at All The scientific debate over quantum computers and quantum technologies, which flares up and dies down by turns, has been unexpectedly and directly joined by the voice of RAS President Gennady…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 48 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026

David E. Shaw, The Quant Who Returned To Building Computers
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026

Interview with Matthias Troyer, Vice President & Technical Fellow at Microsoft
Quantum Computing Report · Sep 23, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026