aiqbench analysis
This study reveals that Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are highly sensitive to the mere presence of an image rather than its semantic content, causing label instability in substitutability tests regardless of whether images align or contradict the text. The findings indicate that evaluation metrics for VLMs often reflect specific test configurations rather than intrinsic model capabilities, necessitating more robust stress testing protocols.
It's Not What the Image Shows: Irrelevant Context Destabilises VLM Judges Without Informing Them
arXiv:2609.37863v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in place of human annotators, making it important that substitutability tests reflect the model rather than incidental evaluation conditions. We introduce MIST, the Misleading-Image Stress Test: 200 English sentences, each built around a phrase readable either figuratively or literally and shown with an aligned image depicting its reading, a misleading image depicting the opposite, or no image at all. The guidelines require the label to be decided from the sentence alone, so no image should change any answer. We expected each image to pull a judge's labels toward the sense it depicts, and neither kind did. Across thirteen VLM judges, an aligned image changed 20.5% of labels and a misleading one 19.4%, close for every judge and both above the 11.6% produced by deleting the ignore-the-image instruction with the image left in place. Yet only 37% of the labels that differ between the two images moved toward the sense shown, and agreement with our human annotators is unchanged whether the image is absent, aligned or misleading. The effect is smaller in the seven judges that pass the alt-test than in the six that never do, but present in all of them: what moves a judge is that an image is there, not which of the two it is, so a substitutability verdict describes a configuration as much as a model.
Abstract:Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in place of human annotators, making it important that substitutability tests reflect the model rather than incidental evaluation conditions. We introduce MIST, the Misleading-Image Stress Test: 200 English sentences, each built around a phrase readable either figuratively or literally and shown with an aligned image depicting its reading, a misleading image depicting the opposite, or no image at all. The guidelines require the label to be decided from the sentence alone, so no image should change any answer. We expected each image to pull a judge's labels toward the sense it depicts, and neither kind did. Across thirteen VLM judges, an aligned image changed 20.5% of labels and a misleading one 19.4%, close for every judge and both above the 11.6% produced by deleting the ignore-the-image instruction with the image left in place. Yet only 37% of the labels that differ between the two images moved toward the sense shown, and agreement with our human annotators is unchanged whether the image is absent, aligned or misleading. The effect is smaller in the seven judges that pass the alt-test than in the six that never do, but present in all of them: what moves a judge is that an image is there, not which of the two it is, so a substitutability verdict describes a configuration as much as a model.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2609.37863 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.37863v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.37863 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 330 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Snorkel AI Blog · Oct 2, 2026
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026