Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI & Society

aiqbench analysis

This arXiv study elicits how people draw privacy lines when an AI agent shares their information, using 1,650 boundaries from 169 participants across 60 scenarios. Its main finding is that delegating disclosure to AI, along with the sender's role and personal privacy needs, shifts how sensitive people are to identifiers and granularity. For AI readers, the practical takeaway is that privacy-aware agents may need context-specific, user-tuned boundaries rather than one general privacy norm, though the study's scope is a single between-subjects design and its generalizability remains to be tested.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

It's My Agent, Not Me: Personal Privacy Boundaries in AI-Delegated Information Sharing

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2509.21712v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Aligning AI systems with human privacy preferences requires understanding individuals' nuanced disclosure behaviors beyond general privacy norms. Yet eliciting these boundaries remains challenging because they involve context-dependent trade-offs. We present an elicitation approach that probes individuals' privacy boundaries through a discriminative task. Through a between-subjects study with varying communication roles and delegation conditions, we collected 1,650 privacy boundaries from 169 participants across 60 scenarios. We examined how communication roles, AI delegation, and individual differences influence boundaries. Results show that communication roles significantly influence sensitivity to disclosure granularity or identifiability, depending on whose private information is shared; AI delegation and individuals' need for privacy heighten sensitivity to disclosed identifiers. Our analysis further reveals how AI delegation shifts privacy preferences across contexts, highlighting new complexities in AI-mediated communication. We advocate eliciting nuanced privacy boundaries within real-world data flows by considering roles and AI delegation, and enabling user involvement in guiding privacy-aware AI behavior.

Abstract:Aligning AI systems with human privacy preferences requires understanding individuals' nuanced disclosure behaviors beyond general privacy norms. Yet eliciting these boundaries remains challenging because they involve context-dependent trade-offs. We present an elicitation approach that probes individuals' privacy boundaries through a discriminative task. Through a between-subjects study with varying communication roles and delegation conditions, we collected 1,650 privacy boundaries from 169 participants across 60 scenarios. We examined how communication roles, AI delegation, and individual differences influence boundaries. Results show that communication roles significantly influence sensitivity to disclosure granularity or identifiability, depending on whose private information is shared; AI delegation and individuals' need for privacy heighten sensitivity to disclosed identifiers. Our analysis further reveals how AI delegation shifts privacy preferences across contexts, highlighting new complexities in AI-mediated communication. We advocate eliciting nuanced privacy boundaries within real-world data flows by considering roles and AI delegation, and enabling user involvement in guiding privacy-aware AI behavior.

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2509.21712 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2509.21712v2 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.21712 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage