aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the stability of rapid mixing in open quantum systems, demonstrating that local perturbations can destroy this property even without altering the steady state. The authors identify specific classes of systems, such as quasifree fermionic models and commuting Lindbladians, where rapid mixing remains robust under perturbation. These findings clarify the boundaries of convergence behavior in engineered quantum processes and their resilience to noise.
Is rapid mixing stable?
arXiv:2609.36016v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Several physically interesting Lindbladians, such as those describing generic open quantum system models as well as engineered state preparation processes, are often rapidly mixing, that is, they relax to steady states in time scaling polylogarithmically with the system size. Owing to the short mixing times, it is physically expected that local perturbations do not substantially increase the mixing time. In this work we question this expectation and ask whether rapid mixing survives. We provide counterexamples showing that rapid mixing is not stable in general, even when the perturbation does not change the steady state. We also show that arbitrarily weak local Hamiltonian perturbations can destroy rapid mixing. Complementing these results, we develop an array of sufficient conditions which imply stable rapid mixing, including several classes of quasifree fermionic systems, commuting Lindbladians, and local spin systems. We also identify conditions under which modified logarithmic Sobolev inequalities (MLSIs), a stronger form of convergence, lead to stable rapid mixing. As a further implication of our results, we show that rapid mixing does not imply a positive MLSI constant.
Title:Is rapid mixing stable?
Abstract:Several physically interesting Lindbladians, such as those describing generic open quantum system models as well as engineered state preparation processes, are often rapidly mixing, that is, they relax to steady states in time scaling polylogarithmically with the system size. Owing to the short mixing times, it is physically expected that local perturbations do not substantially increase the mixing time. In this work we question this expectation and ask whether rapid mixing survives. We provide counterexamples showing that rapid mixing is not stable in general, even when the perturbation does not change the steady state. We also show that arbitrarily weak local Hamiltonian perturbations can destroy rapid mixing. Complementing these results, we develop an array of sufficient conditions which imply stable rapid mixing, including several classes of quasifree fermionic systems, commuting Lindbladians, and local spin systems. We also identify conditions under which modified logarithmic Sobolev inequalities (MLSIs), a stronger form of convergence, lead to stable rapid mixing. As a further implication of our results, we show that rapid mixing does not imply a positive MLSI constant.
arXiv:2609.36016 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.36016v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36016 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026
When Do Local Score Models Extrapolate Across Size? A Diagnostic Theory and Benchmark
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026

Designing Production-Ready Battery Energy Storage Systems for AI Factories
NVIDIA · Jun 10, 2026