Is my model perplexed for the right reason? Contrasting LLMs' Benchmark Behavior with Token-Level Perplexity

Title:Is my model perplexed for the right reason? Contrasting LLMs' Benchmark Behavior with Token-Level Perplexity

Abstract:Standard evaluations of Large language models (LLMs) focus on task performance, offering limited insight into whether correct behavior reflects appropriate underlying mechanisms and risking confirmation bias. We introduce a simple, principled interpretability framework based on token-level perplexity to test whether models rely on linguistically relevant cues. By comparing perplexity distributions over minimal sentence pairs differing in one or a few `pivotal' tokens, our method enables precise, hypothesis-driven analysis without relying on unstable feature-attribution techniques. Experiments on controlled linguistic benchmarks with several open-weight LLMs show that, while linguistically important tokens influence model behavior, they never fully explain perplexity shifts, revealing that models rely on heuristics other than the expected linguistic ones.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2603.29396 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.29396v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29396 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.