aiqbench analysis
This article analyzes the legal boundaries of using copyrighted text for AI model training, specifically examining the distinction between lawful ingestion and illegal piracy in recent court rulings. It highlights how current copyright interpretations are evolving to accommodate the unique data processing methods of large language models without infringing on author rights.
Is it legal to train AI models on copyrighted books? It’s complicated

Most published authors have, without their knowledge or consent, contributed to the development of the same AI tools that threaten to undermine their livelihoods. That seems illegal, right?
You probably know by now that the AI models powering ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and other chatbots are trained on seemingly infinite databases of published works, containing hundreds of millions of books, online articles, academic papers, and basically anything you can find on the internet. Most published authors have, without their knowledge or consent, contributed to the development of the same AI tools that threaten to undermine their livelihoods. That seems illegal, right? The reality isn’t that simple. “I think one of the issues with this entire area of law and this entire area of technology is there’s a lot…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 99 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage

Can Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince save the web from AI?
The Verge · Sep 26, 2026

Underwriting Superintelligence: Backing Agents you can Sue — Rune Kvist, AIUC
Latent Space · Sep 16, 2026

AI Futures: Racing to Lose, A sermon
LessWrong · Sep 28, 2026

Artists are lawyering up against AI slop, and some are even winning
The Verge · Jul 29, 2026