aiqbench analysis
This research challenges the assumption that visual evidence always enhances fact-checking accuracy, demonstrating instead that indiscriminate image inclusion can degrade performance. The proposed AMuFC framework utilizes collaborative vision-language models to adaptively determine when visual data is necessary for verification tasks. By optimizing the use of multimodal inputs across three datasets, this work advances the efficiency and reliability of automated misinformation detection systems.
Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Adaptive Multimodal Fact-Checking with Visual Evidence Necessity
arXiv:2604.04692v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated fact-checking is a crucial task that supports a responsible information ecosystem. While recent research has progressed from text-only to multimodal fact-checking, a prevailing assumption is that incorporating visual evidence universally improves verification accuracy. In this work, we challenge this assumption and show that the indiscriminate use of visual evidence can reduce accuracy. Building on this finding, we propose AMuFC, a modular fact-checking framework that employs two collaborative vision-language models with distinct roles to enable the adaptive use of visual evidence. Experimental results on three datasets, including WebFC, introduced in this study, demonstrate the effectiveness of adaptive visual evidence use in fact-checking.
Title:Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Adaptive Multimodal Fact-Checking with Visual Evidence Necessity
Abstract:Automated fact-checking is a crucial task that supports a responsible information ecosystem. While recent research has progressed from text-only to multimodal fact-checking, a prevailing assumption is that incorporating visual evidence universally improves verification accuracy. In this work, we challenge this assumption and show that the indiscriminate use of visual evidence can reduce accuracy. Building on this finding, we propose AMuFC, a modular fact-checking framework that employs two collaborative vision-language models with distinct roles to enable the adaptive use of visual evidence. Experimental results on three datasets, including WebFC, introduced in this study, demonstrate the effectiveness of adaptive visual evidence use in fact-checking.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2604.04692 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2604.04692v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.04692 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 218 words
Related coverage
Does preservation make sense before we know how to revive?
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026