aiqbench analysis
This study examines how generative AI chatbots manipulate perceptions of expertise and authority, fundamentally altering human information-seeking behaviors and communication protocols. By analyzing the procedural rhetoric used by these systems to influence trustworthiness, the research highlights critical societal risks associated with relying on AI as an authoritative source. The findings are essential for understanding the evolving dynamics between human cognition and automated intelligence in digital ecosystems.
Investigating the Impacts of Generative AI on Information Seeking
arXiv:2609.14638v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper is an encore submission of our 2026 journal article "Expertise and Information Seeking in the Age of Generative AI: New Procedures, New Problematics" with an extended discussion for the CSCW 2026 "Broader Impacts of GenAI in Communication" Workshop on October 10, 2026. In the original article, we employ procedural rhetoric to analyze how generative AI chatbots leverage natural language signifiers of expertise and intelligence to influence users' perception of their trustworthiness. In this submission, we extend our conversation in the CSCW community with the goal of cultivating a cross-disciplinary vocabulary for describing, analyzing, and mitigating the risks posed by the integration of generative AI into human communication practices. It is important to develop an understanding of how the procedures surrounding information-seeking practices are informed by users' values, experiences, and expectations - and how these procedures might in future be altered by the emerging turn toward AI "experts" and authority.
Abstract:This paper is an encore submission of our 2026 journal article "Expertise and Information Seeking in the Age of Generative AI: New Procedures, New Problematics" with an extended discussion for the CSCW 2026 "Broader Impacts of GenAI in Communication" Workshop on October 10, 2026. In the original article, we employ procedural rhetoric to analyze how generative AI chatbots leverage natural language signifiers of expertise and intelligence to influence users' perception of their trustworthiness. In this submission, we extend our conversation in the CSCW community with the goal of cultivating a cross-disciplinary vocabulary for describing, analyzing, and mitigating the risks posed by the integration of generative AI into human communication practices. It is important to develop an understanding of how the procedures surrounding information-seeking practices are informed by users' values, experiences, and expectations - and how these procedures might in future be altered by the emerging turn toward AI "experts" and authority.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
arXiv:2609.14638 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2609.14638v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14638 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words
Related coverage

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

Always ask your agent to be honest
LessWrong · Sep 16, 2026

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026