aiqbench analysis
This paper gives a closed-form analysis of how a single gradient step shapes features in a deep linear network with mean-field scaling. It shows that the step amplifies task-relevant directions that ridge regression would otherwise shrink, and that this helps generalization only when the spike strength and effective signal-to-noise ratio are large enough. For ML practitioners, the result is a theoretical account of when early training helps, not a practical method, and its conclusions currently hold for linear, idealized settings.
Investigating the Early Signatures of Feature Learning in Deep Linear Networks
arXiv:2610.37834v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Deep neural networks learn data-dependent features, a capacity widely credited for their empirical success. However, explicitly characterizing what features emerge -- and when they improve generalization -- is challenging, since training is nonlinear and non-convex and the data is often anisotropic. Here, we give a closed-form account of feature learning for a deep linear network in a mean-field parameterization, trained by one gradient step from initialization on high-dimensional data carrying a low-dimensional (spiked) signal. In the infinite-width mean-field limit, one step updates each layer's feature kernel by a target-aligned rank-one spike, amplified by both the learning rate and the layer depth. We next assess how these features impact prediction through kernel ridge regression (KRR), finding that KRR on the learned feature kernel yields scalar inflation of the KRR estimator at initialization -- an "anti-shrinkage" mechanism that reinflates task-relevant directions suppressed by ridge, while also amplifying noise. To study when this inflation improves generalization, in the overparameterized proportional limit we derive closed-form expressions for the bias, variance, and generalization errors of these estimators in terms of key macroscopic parameters -- notably the spike strength and spike-target alignment. Crucially, we find that a one-step generalization advantage vanishes for isotropic inputs and appears when both the spike strength and an effective signal-to-noise ratio are sufficiently large, demonstrating that a successful first gradient step both requires and benefits from low-dimensional task structure.
Abstract:Deep neural networks learn data-dependent features, a capacity widely credited for their empirical success. However, explicitly characterizing what features emerge -- and when they improve generalization -- is challenging, since training is nonlinear and non-convex and the data is often anisotropic. Here, we give a closed-form account of feature learning for a deep linear network in a mean-field parameterization, trained by one gradient step from initialization on high-dimensional data carrying a low-dimensional (spiked) signal. In the infinite-width mean-field limit, one step updates each layer's feature kernel by a target-aligned rank-one spike, amplified by both the learning rate and the layer depth. We next assess how these features impact prediction through kernel ridge regression (KRR), finding that KRR on the learned feature kernel yields scalar inflation of the KRR estimator at initialization -- an "anti-shrinkage" mechanism that reinflates task-relevant directions suppressed by ridge, while also amplifying noise. To study when this inflation improves generalization, in the overparameterized proportional limit we derive closed-form expressions for the bias, variance, and generalization errors of these estimators in terms of key macroscopic parameters -- notably the spike strength and spike-target alignment. Crucially, we find that a one-step generalization advantage vanishes for isotropic inputs and appears when both the spike strength and an effective signal-to-noise ratio are sufficiently large, demonstrating that a successful first gradient step both requires and benefits from low-dimensional task structure.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.37834 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2610.37834v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.37834 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 325 words
Related coverage
Agent or Human? Detecting Commits by AI Coding Agents in the Absence of Authorship Signatures
arXiv · Oct 29, 2026
Estimation of covariance matrix for Stokes-like measurement under phase-space deformation
arXiv · Oct 28, 2026
Thermalization Dynamics in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model with Neural-Network Quantum States
arXiv · Aug 3, 2026
Toward Fast Human Reaction Modeling from High-Frequency Digital Interaction Data
arXiv · Oct 27, 2026