aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel loss function designed to correct the inherent bias of standard regression metrics in financial time-series prediction, where symmetric penalties unfairly penalize genuine directional skill against noisy zero-mean returns. By enforcing asymmetry that vanishes at zero and adapting to heavy-tailed distributions, the proposed method aims to improve the reliability of gradient-boosted models for predicting asset log-returns.
Introducing the CZAR Loss: A Tailored Objective Function for Financial Log-Return Predictions
arXiv:2609.36061v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In quantitative finance, standard regression losses are misaligned with the economics of return prediction. As the conditional mean of financial log-returns is close to zero, symmetric losses such as the mean squared and mean absolute errors make the constant zero forecast a near-optimal solution, penalizing models with genuine but noisy directional skill. This applies both during training, where predictions shrink toward zero, and during evaluation, where trivial forecasters can lead loss-based rankings. Under a Gaussian linear prediction model, we show that all symmetric monotonic losses share a universal breakeven directional accuracy against the zero predictor, which rises sharply and becomes unobtainable as the prediction noise approaches the standard deviation of the returns. We introduce the CZAR (Composite Zero-Agnostic Return) loss function, a piecewise quadratic loss built around five key requirements: convexity in the prediction, asymmetry with true return direction that vanishes at zero, near-linear penalization of undershoots and wrong-direction predictions, divergence for large errors, and an adaptive loss floor for evaluation. CZAR is provably convex in the prediction at fixed true value, has closed-form gradient and Hessian suitable for custom objectives in gradient-boosted libraries, and its four hyperparameters reduce to a single choice through correlated defaults. In idealized tests, the minimum directional accuracy required for a CZAR-evaluated forecaster to outperform the zero predictor under mean log loss remains near the 50% chance level, whereas the corresponding threshold for symmetric losses rises sharply with prediction noise. This advantage persists under heavy-tailed return distributions. In a LightGBM experiment on intraday BTC log-returns, CZAR-trained models reduce the `zero-returns bias' and improve directional accuracy on large-magnitude returns.
Abstract:In quantitative finance, standard regression losses are misaligned with the economics of return prediction. As the conditional mean of financial log-returns is close to zero, symmetric losses such as the mean squared and mean absolute errors make the constant zero forecast a near-optimal solution, penalizing models with genuine but noisy directional skill. This applies both during training, where predictions shrink toward zero, and during evaluation, where trivial forecasters can lead loss-based rankings. Under a Gaussian linear prediction model, we show that all symmetric monotonic losses share a universal breakeven directional accuracy against the zero predictor, which rises sharply and becomes unobtainable as the prediction noise approaches the standard deviation of the returns. We introduce the CZAR (Composite Zero-Agnostic Return) loss function, a piecewise quadratic loss built around five key requirements: convexity in the prediction, asymmetry with true return direction that vanishes at zero, near-linear penalization of undershoots and wrong-direction predictions, divergence for large errors, and an adaptive loss floor for evaluation. CZAR is provably convex in the prediction at fixed true value, has closed-form gradient and Hessian suitable for custom objectives in gradient-boosted libraries, and its four hyperparameters reduce to a single choice through correlated defaults. In idealized tests, the minimum directional accuracy required for a CZAR-evaluated forecaster to outperform the zero predictor under mean log loss remains near the 50% chance level, whereas the corresponding threshold for symmetric losses rises sharply with prediction noise. This advantage persists under heavy-tailed return distributions. In a LightGBM experiment on intraday BTC log-returns, CZAR-trained models reduce the `zero-returns bias' and improve directional accuracy on large-magnitude returns.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Computational Finance (q-fin.CP); Mathematical Finance (q-fin.MF)
arXiv:2609.36061 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.36061v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36061 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
https://doi.org/10.70235/allora.0x30033 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 379 words
Related coverage

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

Hint-based CoT faithfulness evals still mostly work on Claude
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Dynamic Objective Selection with Safeguards and LLM Oversight for Financial Decision-Making
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026