aiqbench analysis
This article introduces Supabase Evals, an open-source framework designed to benchmark the performance of AI coding agents specifically within the Supabase ecosystem. By evaluating agents on real-world tasks like schema creation and debugging RLS policies, it provides critical data for developers assessing how well current models handle database operations compared to manual workflows.
Introducing Supabase Evals

Our open-source benchmark for how well AI coding agents build with Supabase.
Today we're open sourcing supabase/evals, our benchmark and framework for testing how well AI agents build using Supabase. It runs coding agents including Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode against real Supabase tasks, for example, building a schema, debugging a failed Edge Function, or fixing a broken RLS policy, and then scores how well they performed. It powers both our published benchmark and an internal regression suite we monitor daily. As more people ship Supabase projects through an agent instead of by hand, we wanted a way to measure that experience instead of guessing. The results cited here reflect a snapshot at…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 101 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

[AINews] DeepSeek v4.1-Flash: 763B-P8B-D16B novel causal Encoder–Decoder architecture with vision marks the Return of the Whale
Latent Space · Sep 12, 2026

Are Supabase docs agent-friendly? We didn't know, so we checked
Supabase · Aug 1, 2026
Fable is SOTA at CIFAR Speedrun (& specification gaming)
LessWrong · Jul 20, 2026