Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study corrects a critical flaw in cross-entropy benchmarking by proving that additive single-qubit error approximations systematically overestimate gate fidelities in large-scale quantum processors. By deriving an analytical expression for joint decay and validating it on superconducting hardware, the authors establish a rigorous theoretical foundation for interleaved benchmarking protocols that offer higher precision than standard methods. This work provides essential tools for accurately characterizing noise and performance in next-generation quantum computing architectures.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Interleaved Benchmarking with Single-Qubit References

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2603.05422v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a rigorous theoretical justification. Here we show that the commonly employed additive single-qubit errors approximation underlying this approach breaks down and leads to a systematic overestimation of gate fidelities. We derive an analytical expression for the joint decay of simultaneous single-qubit reference sequences, identify when interleaved circuits generate sufficient randomization for the standard depolarizing approximation, and obtain a refined expression for the interleaved gate fidelity estimation. Experiments on a superconducting quantum processor validate the theory and demonstrate that fidelities obtained using XEB with single-qubit references agree with those extracted from standard interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), while achieving higher precision due to reduced reference-sequence errors. Our results establish theoretical foundation for interleaved benchmarking protocols employing single-qubit reference sequences and show that, with appropriate post-processing, they provide a simple and accurate alternative to multi-qubit Clifford reference circuits.

Authors:Ilya A. Simakov, Arina V. Zotova, Tatyana A. Chudakova, Alena S. Kazmina, Artyom M. Polyanskiy, Nikolay N. Abramov, Mikhail A. Tarkhov, Alexander M. Mumlyakov, Igor V. Trofimov, Nikita Yu. Rudenko, Maxim V. Chichkov, Vladimir I. Chichkov, Grigoriy S. Mazhorin

Abstract:Cross-entropy benchmarking (XEB) with single-qubit reference sequences is widely used to characterize multi-qubit gates in large-scale quantum processors, despite the lack of a rigorous theoretical justification. Here we show that the commonly employed additive single-qubit errors approximation underlying this approach breaks down and leads to a systematic overestimation of gate fidelities. We derive an analytical expression for the joint decay of simultaneous single-qubit reference sequences, identify when interleaved circuits generate sufficient randomization for the standard depolarizing approximation, and obtain a refined expression for the interleaved gate fidelity estimation. Experiments on a superconducting quantum processor validate the theory and demonstrate that fidelities obtained using XEB with single-qubit references agree with those extracted from standard interleaved randomized benchmarking (IRB), while achieving higher precision due to reduced reference-sequence errors. Our results establish theoretical foundation for interleaved benchmarking protocols employing single-qubit reference sequences and show that, with appropriate post-processing, they provide a simple and accurate alternative to multi-qubit Clifford reference circuits.

arXiv:2603.05422 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2603.05422v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 204 words

Related coverage