Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

Intent Engine addresses the critical gap between high-level natural language commands and low-level orchestration artifacts, significantly reducing configuration errors in edge-cloud environments. By leveraging LLMs with schema constraints and retrieval grounding, the system validates Service-Level Objectives before deployment, thereby preventing downstream placement failures that plague current systems. This advancement makes intent-driven compute continuum management more reliable and accessible for enterprise infrastructure teams.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Intent Engine: Natural-Language Intent Translation for Intent-Driven Orchestration in the Compute Continuum

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.20388v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Microservice placement in the compute continuum is driven by low-level Service-level Objectives (SLOs), but requiring users to specify metric-level constraints creates an adoption barrier and increases misconfiguration risk. Although large language models (LLMs) can interpret natural-language intents, direct generation of orchestration-consumable SLO artifacts remains unreliable due to unsupported constraints, incorrect grounded values, and schema violations. These errors can propagate to downstream placement logic and produce infeasible or incorrect placements. This paper presents Intent Engine, a natural-language intent translation architecture that constructs validated SLO artifacts for compute-continuum service placement. Intent Engine acts as an intent acquisition and SLO construction layer for existing intent-driven orchestration and placement frameworks; it does not perform placement or runtime QoS optimization. The architecture combines schema-constrained extraction, retrieval-grounded value construction from monitored infrastructure state, and validation against supported constraints before emitting the final SLO artifact. We evaluate Intent Engine using a 716-record intent-to-SLO dataset derived from an edge-cloud testbed, including valid and invalid intents. Across GPT-4.1 mini, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and DeepSeek V4-Flash, Intent Engine outperforms prompting baselines and a non-LLM rule-based parser. With GPT-4.1 mini, it achieves 0.941 total F1 Score and reduces aggregate hallucination by 85.1%, while lowering downstream placement failure from 30.8% to 2.1%.

Abstract:Microservice placement in the compute continuum is driven by low-level Service-level Objectives (SLOs), but requiring users to specify metric-level constraints creates an adoption barrier and increases misconfiguration risk. Although large language models (LLMs) can interpret natural-language intents, direct generation of orchestration-consumable SLO artifacts remains unreliable due to unsupported constraints, incorrect grounded values, and schema violations. These errors can propagate to downstream placement logic and produce infeasible or incorrect placements. This paper presents Intent Engine, a natural-language intent translation architecture that constructs validated SLO artifacts for compute-continuum service placement. Intent Engine acts as an intent acquisition and SLO construction layer for existing intent-driven orchestration and placement frameworks; it does not perform placement or runtime QoS optimization. The architecture combines schema-constrained extraction, retrieval-grounded value construction from monitored infrastructure state, and validation against supported constraints before emitting the final SLO artifact. We evaluate Intent Engine using a 716-record intent-to-SLO dataset derived from an edge-cloud testbed, including valid and invalid intents. Across GPT-4.1 mini, Claude Sonnet 4.5, and DeepSeek V4-Flash, Intent Engine outperforms prompting baselines and a non-LLM rule-based parser. With GPT-4.1 mini, it achieves 0.941 total F1 Score and reduces aggregate hallucination by 85.1%, while lowering downstream placement failure from 30.8% to 2.1%.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)

arXiv:2608.20388 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.20388v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20388 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 299 words

Related coverage