aiqbench analysis
This research proposes an algorithm that integrates human-based feature understandability scores directly into the model training phase to enhance the accessibility of tabular data explanations. By selecting features that are both informative and easier for users to comprehend, the study aims to bridge the gap between raw model performance and user acceptance without significantly sacrificing classification accuracy. The findings suggest that prioritizing understandable features can yield a statistically significant preference from users, offering a practical pathway for more effective human-centered AI systems.
Integrating Feature Understandability into Feature Selection for Human-Centred Tabular Explanations
arXiv:2610.16627v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing human-centred XAI research predominantly evaluates explanations after they have been generated. However, this fails to provide actionable insights into improving accessibility. This study incorporates human-based feature understandability into feature selection to improve the generation of human-centred explanations. Natural language explanations for machine learning models trained on tabular data often cite influential features in the input data to explain a given decision. As a consequence, users' ability to understand the produced explanation hinges on their understanding of the cited features. To quantify this natural-language feature understandability, Rossberg et al. proposed the Feature Understandability Scale, which assigns numerical `understandability scores' to features based on user feedback. To evaluate the degree to which these scores can improve machine learning explanation quality, this study collects understandability scores across two datasets, proposes an understandability-aware feature selection algorithm to select features that are both understandable and informative, and trains a random forest based on these feature subsets. The SHAP-based explanations generated by this model are evaluated using user feedback, and changes in explanation quality are assessed. The individual evaluation of the explanations showed that while the understandability-based explanations scored higher on average, the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the comparative evaluation found that participants preferred these explanations significantly more frequently than expected at the chance level. It is concluded that the integration of understandability can yield more understandable explanations at minimal cost to classification performance, although changes to quality require elucidation in larger cohorts.
Abstract:Existing human-centred XAI research predominantly evaluates explanations after they have been generated. However, this fails to provide actionable insights into improving accessibility. This study incorporates human-based feature understandability into feature selection to improve the generation of human-centred explanations. Natural language explanations for machine learning models trained on tabular data often cite influential features in the input data to explain a given decision. As a consequence, users' ability to understand the produced explanation hinges on their understanding of the cited features. To quantify this natural-language feature understandability, Rossberg et al. proposed the Feature Understandability Scale, which assigns numerical `understandability scores' to features based on user feedback. To evaluate the degree to which these scores can improve machine learning explanation quality, this study collects understandability scores across two datasets, proposes an understandability-aware feature selection algorithm to select features that are both understandable and informative, and trains a random forest based on these feature subsets. The SHAP-based explanations generated by this model are evaluated using user feedback, and changes in explanation quality are assessed. The individual evaluation of the explanations showed that while the understandability-based explanations scored higher on average, the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the comparative evaluation found that participants preferred these explanations significantly more frequently than expected at the chance level. It is concluded that the integration of understandability can yield more understandable explanations at minimal cost to classification performance, although changes to quality require elucidation in larger cohorts.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.16627 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2610.16627v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.16627 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 345 words
Related coverage
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026

Presentation: Engineering AI for Creativity and Curiosity on Mobile
InfoQ · Jul 21, 2026

BRICS Draws a New Global Line: Full Text of New Delhi Declaration
slguardian.org · Sep 12, 2026