Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a Deconditional Gaussian Process framework to address the critical gap in quantifying epistemic uncertainty for instrumental variable and proximal causal learning methods. By recovering standard kernel estimators as posterior means while providing well-calibrated variance, it offers a unified approach for reliable decision-making under unobserved confounding. The work advances fundamental machine learning capabilities by enabling systematic model selection through marginal log-likelihood optimization within complex causal structures.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, AWS
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Instrumental and Proximal Causal Inference with Gaussian Processes

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2603.02159v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Instrumental variable (IV) and proximal causal learning (Proxy) methods are central frameworks for causal inference in the presence of unobserved confounding. Despite substantial methodological advances, existing approaches rarely provide reliable epistemic uncertainty (EU) quantification. We address this gap through a Deconditional Gaussian Process (DGP) framework for uncertainty-aware causal learning. Our formulation recovers popular kernel estimators as the posterior mean, ensuring predictive precision, while the posterior variance yields principled and well-calibrated EU. Moreover, the probabilistic structure enables systematic model selection via marginal log-likelihood optimization. Empirical results demonstrate strong predictive performance alongside informative EU quantification, evaluated via empirical coverage frequencies and decision-aware accuracy rejection curves. Together, our approach provides a unified, practical solution for causal inference under unobserved confounding with reliable uncertainty.

Abstract:Instrumental variable (IV) and proximal causal learning (Proxy) methods are central frameworks for causal inference in the presence of unobserved confounding. Despite substantial methodological advances, existing approaches rarely provide reliable epistemic uncertainty (EU) quantification. We address this gap through a Deconditional Gaussian Process (DGP) framework for uncertainty-aware causal learning. Our formulation recovers popular kernel estimators as the posterior mean, ensuring predictive precision, while the posterior variance yields principled and well-calibrated EU. Moreover, the probabilistic structure enables systematic model selection via marginal log-likelihood optimization. Empirical results demonstrate strong predictive performance alongside informative EU quantification, evaluated via empirical coverage frequencies and decision-aware accuracy rejection curves. Together, our approach provides a unified, practical solution for causal inference under unobserved confounding with reliable uncertainty.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2603.02159 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2603.02159v2 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.02159 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 215 words

Related coverage