Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies a critical bottleneck in production LLMs where instruction-following rates collapse non-linearly as multiple constraints accumulate due to inherent pairwise conflicts. The authors propose a training-free "instruction compiler" that rewrites complex prompts into single calls, significantly boosting performance for widely deployed weaker models while leaving stronger architectures largely unaffected. By releasing the benchmark and verifiers, this work provides essential tools for evaluating robustness in real-world multi-constraint scenarios where simple token counts fail to predict degradation.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Instruction Stacking Collapse: A Benchmark and the Capability-Dependent Value of Prompt Compilation

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.02639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Production prompts rarely carry a single instruction. One system message may require valid JSON, a word limit, three citations, and a fixed tone at the same time. We study how instruction-following degrades as such constraints accumulate. We introduce a benchmark that stacks 24 verifier-checked instructions, one to twenty at a time, and evaluate three production-tier LLMs (Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash). Instruction-following degrades non-linearly: the follow rate falls from ~96% to as low as 20%, driven by a structured and reproducible set of pairwise conflicts. A single "output JSON" constraint, for example, is jointly unsatisfiable with nine others. We then evaluate a training-free remedy: an instruction compiler that rewrites the stacked prompt in a single LLM call and is reused across queries. Its benefit is capability-graded. It recovers up to +11 points of follow rate for weaker models, which are also the models most often deployed at scale, while leaving stronger models, which already internalise the same structure, essentially unchanged. Cluster-robust tests, same-baseline controls, and a within-family scaling ladder attribute the gain to the rewrite itself rather than to additional tokens, reordering, or measurement headroom. We release the benchmark, verifiers, and cached runs for full reproduction.

Abstract:Production prompts rarely carry a single instruction. One system message may require valid JSON, a word limit, three citations, and a fixed tone at the same time. We study how instruction-following degrades as such constraints accumulate. We introduce a benchmark that stacks 24 verifier-checked instructions, one to twenty at a time, and evaluate three production-tier LLMs (Claude Sonnet 4.6, GPT-5-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash). Instruction-following degrades non-linearly: the follow rate falls from ~96% to as low as 20%, driven by a structured and reproducible set of pairwise conflicts. A single "output JSON" constraint, for example, is jointly unsatisfiable with nine others. We then evaluate a training-free remedy: an instruction compiler that rewrites the stacked prompt in a single LLM call and is reused across queries. Its benefit is capability-graded. It recovers up to +11 points of follow rate for weaker models, which are also the models most often deployed at scale, while leaving stronger models, which already internalise the same structure, essentially unchanged. Cluster-robust tests, same-baseline controls, and a within-family scaling ladder attribute the gain to the rewrite itself rather than to additional tokens, reordering, or measurement headroom. We release the benchmark, verifiers, and cached runs for full reproduction.

13 pages, 11 figures. Benchmark, deterministic verifiers, and cached model responses released for full reproduction

Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.02639 [cs.SE]

(or arXiv:2608.02639v1 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02639 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words

Related coverage