aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces the Inquesto Score, a rigorous protocol for evaluating voice agent reliability by quantifying functional failures across diverse acoustic conditions and speaker demographics. By moving beyond simple transcript analysis to include direct audio measurements of timing issues like talk-over and delayed responses, it establishes a standardized framework for assessing deployed AI systems in high-stakes workflows. The release of the reference implementation provides the community with essential tools to validate voice pipelines against explicit failure events rather than heterogeneous metrics.
Inquesto Score: A reliability Protocol For Voice Agents
arXiv:2609.30514v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Voice agents are increasingly deployed in workflows where failed interactions can affect transactions, access, and other consequential outcomes, creating a need for reproducible and interpretable evaluation. We introduce Inquesto Score (IS), a protocol for measuring voice-agent reliability as the percentage of calls in a fixed, versioned evaluation population that achieve the caller's goal without a functional failure or worse. Rather than combining heterogeneous metrics, IS defines explicit failure events and severity levels and evaluates the deployed voice pipeline. Timing failures, including talk-over and delayed responses, are measured directly from audio, while semantic and state-dependent failures are evaluated using scenario predicates, tool traces, and a pinned open-model judge. Diagnostic views of behavior, acoustic robustness, identity handling, and speaker groups accompany the score without being combined into it. Inquesto Score v0.1 evaluates 30 scenarios, three acoustic conditions, four speaker groups, and 306 calls per agent across 13 configurations of a reference voice-agent system. Our evaluation shows that reliable measurement requires evidence beyond transcripts, explicit treatment of deployment conditions, and validation of the evaluators used to determine outcomes. We release the protocol, reference implementation, and evaluation records.
Abstract:Voice agents are increasingly deployed in workflows where failed interactions can affect transactions, access, and other consequential outcomes, creating a need for reproducible and interpretable evaluation. We introduce Inquesto Score (IS), a protocol for measuring voice-agent reliability as the percentage of calls in a fixed, versioned evaluation population that achieve the caller's goal without a functional failure or worse. Rather than combining heterogeneous metrics, IS defines explicit failure events and severity levels and evaluates the deployed voice pipeline. Timing failures, including talk-over and delayed responses, are measured directly from audio, while semantic and state-dependent failures are evaluated using scenario predicates, tool traces, and a pinned open-model judge. Diagnostic views of behavior, acoustic robustness, identity handling, and speaker groups accompany the score without being combined into it. Inquesto Score v0.1 evaluates 30 scenarios, three acoustic conditions, four speaker groups, and 306 calls per agent across 13 configurations of a reference voice-agent system. Our evaluation shows that reliable measurement requires evidence beyond transcripts, explicit treatment of deployment conditions, and validation of the evaluators used to determine outcomes. We release the protocol, reference implementation, and evaluation records.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.30514 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.30514v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30514 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026
DuplexSpeechBench-IFEval: Evaluating Implicit Instruction Following in Full-Duplex Voice Agents
arXiv · Sep 5, 2026

Automation’s Early Footprint
Cohere · Sep 3, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026