aiqbench analysis
This arXiv paper proposes Input-Conditioned Search (ICS), a way to get more diverse reasoning from a pretrained recursive reasoner by applying different update maps to the same latent state, with no additional training. The authors report the highest mean accuracy across six reasoning tasks at up to two orders of magnitude fewer FLOPs than the scaling baselines, though these are preprint results that still need independent replication. For readers, the main point is a cheaper inference-time lever for latent reasoning models that avoids the attractor failures of depth or perturbation-based scaling.
Input-Conditioned Search for Efficient Test-Time Scaling of Recursive Reasoners
arXiv:2610.18547v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: People often tackle difficult problems by thinking more deeply or exploring more possibilities. Similarly, recursive reasoners, which reason by repeatedly applying a learned update rule to latent states, can also scale inference through more updates (depth) or additional trajectories generated by perturbing latent states (width). When people hit a dead end in their thinking, they may step back and approach the problem from a fresh angle. However, neither depth scaling nor perturbation-based width scaling of recursive reasoners can reliably achieve this: both may converge to incorrect attractors. To address this, we propose to explore diverse reasoning traces by applying different update maps to the same latent state, without any additional training. We realize this idea through \emph{Input-Conditioned Search (ICS)}, which searches over input conditions to induce alternative update maps from the pretrained reasoner. Across six reasoning tasks, ICS achieves the highest mean accuracy, while requiring up to two orders of magnitude fewer model FLOPs than the evaluated scaling baselines. Controlled experiments confirm that ICS can redirect trajectories from the same state. Our theoretical analysis and rigorous numerical verification also confirm that ICS can locally eliminate incorrect attracting fixed points. Together, these findings establish ICS as an effective axis for efficient test-time scaling and motivate further research on shaping recursive reasoning during training and at test time.
Abstract:People often tackle difficult problems by thinking more deeply or exploring more possibilities. Similarly, recursive reasoners, which reason by repeatedly applying a learned update rule to latent states, can also scale inference through more updates (depth) or additional trajectories generated by perturbing latent states (width). When people hit a dead end in their thinking, they may step back and approach the problem from a fresh angle. However, neither depth scaling nor perturbation-based width scaling of recursive reasoners can reliably achieve this: both may converge to incorrect attractors. To address this, we propose to explore diverse reasoning traces by applying different update maps to the same latent state, without any additional training. We realize this idea through \emph{Input-Conditioned Search (ICS)}, which searches over input conditions to induce alternative update maps from the pretrained reasoner. Across six reasoning tasks, ICS achieves the highest mean accuracy, while requiring up to two orders of magnitude fewer model FLOPs than the evaluated scaling baselines. Controlled experiments confirm that ICS can redirect trajectories from the same state. Our theoretical analysis and rigorous numerical verification also confirm that ICS can locally eliminate incorrect attracting fixed points. Together, these findings establish ICS as an effective axis for efficient test-time scaling and motivate further research on shaping recursive reasoning during training and at test time.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.18547 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.18547v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18547 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 310 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · Aug 3, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026