Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses the interpretability challenges of complex machine learning models by integrating generative inpainting into perturbation-based XAI methods like LIME. By generating photorealistic rather than artificial pixel replacements, the study significantly improves explanation quality while maintaining alignment with the original data distribution for image analysis tasks. The work represents a substantive advancement in visual explainable AI methodologies and their practical utility.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Inpainting Insights: Elevating Visual XAI with Photorealistic Perturbations

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.15482v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The increasing complexity of state-of-the-art machine learning models has made their behavior progressively harder to interpret, spurring rapid advancements in the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Among many methods proposed, perturbation-based approaches play a major role. By systematically altering (perturbing) input features, these approaches measure the impact on the model's predictions. For image data, traditional perturbation techniques, often involve replacing pixel values e.g., with a pre-defined color. However, such approaches, but also more refined deterministic techniques, generate unrealistic out-of-distribution samples and often leave visible artifacts, which can mislead the model and compromise explanation quality. In this work, we adjust LIME, a widely used perturbation-based method, to demonstrate how generative inpainting can improve perturbation-based explanations for images. We achieve photorealistic perturbed samples that align better with the original data distribution and enhance explanation quality.

Abstract:The increasing complexity of state-of-the-art machine learning models has made their behavior progressively harder to interpret, spurring rapid advancements in the field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). Among many methods proposed, perturbation-based approaches play a major role. By systematically altering (perturbing) input features, these approaches measure the impact on the model's predictions. For image data, traditional perturbation techniques, often involve replacing pixel values e.g., with a pre-defined color. However, such approaches, but also more refined deterministic techniques, generate unrealistic out-of-distribution samples and often leave visible artifacts, which can mislead the model and compromise explanation quality. In this work, we adjust LIME, a widely used perturbation-based method, to demonstrate how generative inpainting can improve perturbation-based explanations for images. We achieve photorealistic perturbed samples that align better with the original data distribution and enhance explanation quality.

Preprint accepted at XAIE4 (ICPR 2026). 15 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables. Code available at: this https URL and this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2607.15482 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.15482v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.15482 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words

Related coverage