Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces the Digital Consciousness Model (DCM), a probabilistic framework designed to systematically evaluate evidence for consciousness in AI systems without relying on a single theoretical definition. Initial findings suggest that while current 2024 LLMs are unlikely to be conscious, the evidence against their sentience is not definitive and remains weaker than evidence against consciousness in simpler AI architectures. This work establishes a critical baseline for future research into the philosophical and technical implications of advanced machine learning capabilities.
Sources coveringarXiv, terrytao.wordpress.com, AI Alignment Forum, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2601.17060v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Artificially intelligent systems have become remarkably sophisticated. They hold conversations, write essays, and seem to understand context in ways that surprise even their creators. This raises a crucial question: Are we creating systems that are conscious? The Digital Consciousness Model (DCM) is a first attempt to assess the evidence for consciousness in AI systems in a systematic, probabilistic way. It provides a shared framework for comparing different AIs and biological organisms, and for tracking how the evidence changes over time as AI develops. Instead of adopting a single theory of consciousness, it incorporates a range of leading theories and perspectives - acknowledging that experts disagree fundamentally about what consciousness is and what conditions are necessary for it. This report describes the structure and initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model. Overall, we find that the evidence is against 2024 LLMs being conscious, but the evidence against 2024 LLMs being conscious is not decisive. The evidence against LLM consciousness is much weaker than the evidence against consciousness in simpler AI systems.

Abstract:Artificially intelligent systems have become remarkably sophisticated. They hold conversations, write essays, and seem to understand context in ways that surprise even their creators. This raises a crucial question: Are we creating systems that are conscious? The Digital Consciousness Model (DCM) is a first attempt to assess the evidence for consciousness in AI systems in a systematic, probabilistic way. It provides a shared framework for comparing different AIs and biological organisms, and for tracking how the evidence changes over time as AI develops. Instead of adopting a single theory of consciousness, it incorporates a range of leading theories and perspectives - acknowledging that experts disagree fundamentally about what consciousness is and what conditions are necessary for it. This report describes the structure and initial results of the Digital Consciousness Model. Overall, we find that the evidence is against 2024 LLMs being conscious, but the evidence against 2024 LLMs being conscious is not decisive. The evidence against LLM consciousness is much weaker than the evidence against consciousness in simpler AI systems.

v1.2 Added note to cover page and precisified language for 'demandingness' parameter v1.1 Revised section 4.2 details and acknowledgments

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2601.17060 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2601.17060v3 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.17060 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage