Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes the theoretical limits of verifying low-rank approximations, demonstrating how validation queries can be reused to maintain efficiency as approximation spaces expand. The findings provide critical insights into minimizing computational overhead for error certification in matrix algorithms, a core component of scalable machine learning and quantum simulation workflows. By deriving exact minimax query constants and matching lower bounds, the study offers a rigorous foundation for optimizing resource usage in high-dimensional data processing.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Information Limits of Low-Rank Approximation Certification

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.03321v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Low-rank approximation can require additional matrix--vector products to verify that its error meets a prescribed tolerance. We characterize this certification cost for both relative matrix error and mean-square output error. For a single approximation matrix candidate, we determine the exact dimension-uniform minimax query constant as the allowed failure probability vanishes. Our main result concerns reusing validation responses as the approximation space expands. For a candidate family constructed independently of validation, one batch supports an entire nested path without increasing the query budget with the number of checks. Across \(W\) paths, a concentration bound exploiting shared residual energy yields a \(\sqrt{\log(W+1)}\) dependence. A matching lower bound establishes its optimality for fixed interior error targets and sufficiently small separation gaps. Finally, we compare two uniformly valid certificates on the same dispersed-spectrum family. Optimizing the validation budget within each rule family yields costs of orders \(N^{1/3}\) and \(N^{2/3}\) for validation and construction beyond the true target. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Low-rank-approximation-1275/

Abstract:Low-rank approximation can require additional matrix--vector products to verify that its error meets a prescribed tolerance. We characterize this certification cost for both relative matrix error and mean-square output error. For a single approximation matrix candidate, we determine the exact dimension-uniform minimax query constant as the allowed failure probability vanishes. Our main result concerns reusing validation responses as the approximation space expands. For a candidate family constructed independently of validation, one batch supports an entire nested path without increasing the query budget with the number of checks. Across \(W\) paths, a concentration bound exploiting shared residual energy yields a \(\sqrt{\log(W+1)}\) dependence. A matching lower bound establishes its optimality for fixed interior error targets and sufficiently small separation gaps. Finally, we compare two uniformly valid certificates on the same dispersed-spectrum family. Optimizing the validation budget within each rule family yields costs of orders \(N^{1/3}\) and \(N^{2/3}\) for validation and construction beyond the true target. Code is available at this https URL

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Theory (cs.IT)

arXiv:2610.03321 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2610.03321v1 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03321 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage