aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a rigorous framework for classifying quantum instruments based on information erasure and quantum imprint properties, challenging conventional intuitions about measurement fidelity. Crucially, the study demonstrates that reliable postselection can isolate first-order state-preparation errors from measurement errors, offering a novel pathway to calibrate SPAM errors in quantum hardware.
Information Erasure and Quantum Imprint in Quantum Measurement and First-Order SPAM Error Separation
arXiv:2609.15586v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We introduce information erasure and quantum imprint as two properties that classify quantum instruments. Information erasure is the property that an appropriate postselection can render the distribution of earlier measurement outcomes independent of the initial quantum state while retaining all outcome branches. Quantum imprint is the complementary property that no admissible postselection can eliminate this state dependence. We show that this classification has a nontrivial structure and that the natural intuition that measurements providing more information about the initial quantum state should be less likely to exhibit information erasure does not hold in general. We further show that, under a sufficiently reliable postselection, information erasure enables first-order separation of state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Specifically, the first-order contribution of state-preparation error vanishes from the posterior distribution, whereas visible first-order contributions of measurement error remain. This result recasts SPAM error separation from the problem of simultaneously characterizing state preparation and measurement into the problem of realizing a reliable postselection.
Abstract:We introduce information erasure and quantum imprint as two properties that classify quantum instruments. Information erasure is the property that an appropriate postselection can render the distribution of earlier measurement outcomes independent of the initial quantum state while retaining all outcome branches. Quantum imprint is the complementary property that no admissible postselection can eliminate this state dependence. We show that this classification has a nontrivial structure and that the natural intuition that measurements providing more information about the initial quantum state should be less likely to exhibit information erasure does not hold in general. We further show that, under a sufficiently reliable postselection, information erasure enables first-order separation of state-preparation and measurement (SPAM) errors. Specifically, the first-order contribution of state-preparation error vanishes from the posterior distribution, whereas visible first-order contributions of measurement error remain. This result recasts SPAM error separation from the problem of simultaneously characterizing state preparation and measurement into the problem of realizing a reliable postselection.
arXiv:2609.15586 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.15586v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15586 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 249 words
Related coverage

Inside D-Wave’s Dual-Rail Qubit Roadmap and the New Haven Bet on Logical Qubits
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 11, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

Non-Gaussian Noise Magnetometry Using Local Spin Qubits
Quantum Journal · Aug 27, 2026

How Do Photonic Quantum Computers Work?
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 5, 2026