aiqbench analysis
This research provides precise asymptotic characterizations of influence diagnostics in high-dimensional convex M-estimation, revealing that influential samples typically reside near the decision boundary. These findings offer a rigorous theoretical foundation for data selection heuristics used in active learning and model robustness analysis. By quantifying how individual training points affect learned weights under Gaussian design, the work advances our understanding of statistical influence in modern machine learning regimes.
Influence Diagnostics in High-dimensional M-estimation: Precise Asymptotics
arXiv:2607.09250v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The impact of a given training point on a statistical model can be measured through its leave-one-out influence on the model parameters, which quantifies how its removal from the training set affects the learned weights. For convex M-estimation under Gaussian design, in the high-dimensional limit $n\asymp d$, we show that the empirical distribution of influences across training points concentrates around a deterministic measure which we sharply characterize. This characterization suggests that influential samples tend to lie on average close to the decision boundary, making contact with a standard data selection heuristic in active learning.
Abstract:The impact of a given training point on a statistical model can be measured through its leave-one-out influence on the model parameters, which quantifies how its removal from the training set affects the learned weights. For convex M-estimation under Gaussian design, in the high-dimensional limit $n\asymp d$, we show that the empirical distribution of influences across training points concentrates around a deterministic measure which we sharply characterize. This characterization suggests that influential samples tend to lie on average close to the decision boundary, making contact with a standard data selection heuristic in active learning.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.09250 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2607.09250v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.09250 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 189 words
Related coverage
Doubly Robust Functional Representation Learning for Longitudinal Causal Inference with Irregular Histories
arXiv · Jul 31, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

AI in healthcare: applications and best practices
Databricks · Jul 24, 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026