aiqbench analysis
The paper proposes a planning-level method: robots estimate what a human can see, then reweight candidate actions to keep themselves in or out of the human's line of sight. It is a decision-making and planning contribution rather than a learning system, so its AI relevance is real but narrower than the headline suggests. Readers should weigh the reported simulation and 12-participant study results, which show gains in cooking subtask completion and fewer driving collisions, against the modest scope of the evaluation.
In View or Out of View? A Vision-Aware Filter that Infers and Reacts to the Human's Field of View
arXiv:2610.14577v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: During human-robot interaction, sight plays an important role. When the human sees a robot, they can observe the robot's actions and better predict the robot's future behaviors. Conversely, when the human cannot see the robot, they become uncertain about the robot's intent and plans. In this paper, we focus on the human's field of view. Existing human-aware planners either ignore this field of view and assume the human can observe the entire scene, or intentionally design their interactions so the robot is always visible to the human. By contrast, we enable robots to infer what the human has and has not seen during interaction, i.e., the human's field of view. We then apply this estimate as a vision-aware filter on the robot's actions. Given a nominal robot policy and a model of the interaction, we roll out the policy over a short horizon to see how the robot's state updates. We then reweight the actions based on how those actions impact the robot's predicted visibility: higher weights are assigned to actions that bring the robot into (or away from) the human's line of sight. In practice, our framework provides an online estimation and filtering process that repeatedly updates its understanding of the human's field of view and then locally perturbs robot actions based on the human's vision. We evaluate our vision-aware filter on robots that assist humans in collaborative cooking and coordinate with them in driving environments. Across simulations and a 12-participant user study, we find that our vision-aware filter changes both performance and preference: participants completed over three times as many subtasks with in-view assistance while cooking, and had fewer collisions with cars that purposely stayed out of their view while driving.
Title:In View or Out of View? A Vision-Aware Filter that Infers and Reacts to the Human's Field of View
Abstract:During human-robot interaction, sight plays an important role. When the human sees a robot, they can observe the robot's actions and better predict the robot's future behaviors. Conversely, when the human cannot see the robot, they become uncertain about the robot's intent and plans. In this paper, we focus on the human's field of view. Existing human-aware planners either ignore this field of view and assume the human can observe the entire scene, or intentionally design their interactions so the robot is always visible to the human. By contrast, we enable robots to infer what the human has and has not seen during interaction, i.e., the human's field of view. We then apply this estimate as a vision-aware filter on the robot's actions. Given a nominal robot policy and a model of the interaction, we roll out the policy over a short horizon to see how the robot's state updates. We then reweight the actions based on how those actions impact the robot's predicted visibility: higher weights are assigned to actions that bring the robot into (or away from) the human's line of sight. In practice, our framework provides an online estimation and filtering process that repeatedly updates its understanding of the human's field of view and then locally perturbs robot actions based on the human's vision. We evaluate our vision-aware filter on robots that assist humans in collaborative cooking and coordinate with them in driving environments. Across simulations and a 12-participant user study, we find that our vision-aware filter changes both performance and preference: participants completed over three times as many subtasks with in-view assistance while cooking, and had fewer collisions with cars that purposely stayed out of their view while driving.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2610.14577 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.14577v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14577 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 395 words
Related coverage
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

[AINews] Quasi-Riemann-Hypothesis: OpenAI publishes 722 math papers solving 90 of the top 500 open math problems; “the most significant moment” in >100 years of mathematics
Latent Space · Oct 7, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026