Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces GRAFT, a post-training framework that significantly improves instruction following in Diffusion Large Language Models by addressing attention biases during the denoising process. The study establishes a new benchmark and evaluation protocol to measure performance on constraints anchored at arbitrary output positions, marking a notable advancement in generative AI capabilities.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

In-Place Instruction Following in Diffusion Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.07160v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) generate text via bidirectional iterative denoising, naturally supporting user-specified constraints anchored at arbitrary output positions, a paradigm known as In-place Prompting (IPP). We formalize this as the In-place Instruction Following (IIF) task and construct IIF-Bench, a hierarchical benchmark spanning literal, style, and discourse-function constraints, paired with a rubric-based local-global evaluation protocol. An inference-time attention-bias probe suggests that vanilla dLLMs often under-prioritize constraint spans during denoising. We then propose GRAFT, an IPP-oriented post-training framework combining constraint-aware SFT and preference optimization. On four representative dLLMs, GRAFT raises the average IIF score from 57.75 to 73.10 (+15.35 points), with absolute gains of 15.91 and 15.57 points on literal and discourse-function constraints, while preserving general generation ability.

Abstract:Diffusion Large Language Models (dLLMs) generate text via bidirectional iterative denoising, naturally supporting user-specified constraints anchored at arbitrary output positions, a paradigm known as In-place Prompting (IPP). We formalize this as the In-place Instruction Following (IIF) task and construct IIF-Bench, a hierarchical benchmark spanning literal, style, and discourse-function constraints, paired with a rubric-based local-global evaluation protocol. An inference-time attention-bias probe suggests that vanilla dLLMs often under-prioritize constraint spans during denoising. We then propose GRAFT, an IPP-oriented post-training framework combining constraint-aware SFT and preference optimization. On four representative dLLMs, GRAFT raises the average IIF score from 57.75 to 73.10 (+15.35 points), with absolute gains of 15.91 and 15.57 points on literal and discourse-function constraints, while preserving general generation ability.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.07160 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.07160v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.07160 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 216 words

Related coverage