aiqbench analysis
This research investigates whether In-Context Learning (ICL) can effectively replace instruction tuning for small, multilingual language models where high-quality training data is scarce. The study finds that while ICL offers a viable alternative in resource-constrained scenarios, a performance gap persists compared to tuned models, highlighting the need for further optimization to bridge this divide.
In-context Learning vs. Instruction Tuning: The Case of Small and Multilingual Language Models
arXiv:2503.01611v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Instruction following is a critical ability for Large Language Models to be used directly by humans. This often requires supervised fine-tuning on curated instruction datasets, sometimes complemented with an alignment step. However, in multilingual scenarios, obtaining high-quality data for these stages remains challenging, motivating the exploration of In-Context Learning (ICL) as a possible alternative. In this work, we study whether ICL can serve as a substitute for Instruction Tuning in multilingual language models, while also examining how the comparison changes with model scale. Our results indicate that a gap remains between ICL and Instruction Tuning, motivating further research to reduce it.
Title:In-context Learning vs. Instruction Tuning: The Case of Small and Multilingual Language Models
Abstract:Instruction following is a critical ability for Large Language Models to be used directly by humans. This often requires supervised fine-tuning on curated instruction datasets, sometimes complemented with an alignment step. However, in multilingual scenarios, obtaining high-quality data for these stages remains challenging, motivating the exploration of In-Context Learning (ICL) as a possible alternative. In this work, we study whether ICL can serve as a substitute for Instruction Tuning in multilingual language models, while also examining how the comparison changes with model scale. Our results indicate that a gap remains between ICL and Instruction Tuning, motivating further research to reduce it.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2503.01611 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2503.01611v4 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.01611 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 207 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Enabling Language-specific Reasoning in Multilingual Models with Reinforcement Learning
AMD · Jul 24, 2026
Granite Embedding Multilingual R2: Open Apache 2.0 Multilingual Embeddings with 32K Context — Best Sub-100M Retrieval Quality
Hugging Face · May 14, 2026

Presentation: From Models to Agents: Building Context-Aware Consumer AI at Scale at DoorDash
InfoQ · Aug 15, 2026