aiqbench analysis
This research refines the constant factors in qubitized Hamiltonian simulation by optimizing polynomial approximations via Jacobi-Anger expansions, reducing computational overhead estimates significantly without altering asymptotic scaling laws. By addressing specific mathematical gaps in Bessel tail treatments using Kapteyn's and Watson's inequalities, the study establishes tighter bounds that render further theoretical refinements practically negligible for current quantum hardware constraints.
Improved constant factors for qubitized Hamiltonian simulation
arXiv:2608.02734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Quantum signal processing (QSP) serves as the asymptotically optimal technique for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer. By approximating the time evolution operator via the Jacobi-Anger expansion, the Hamiltonian simulation problem reduces to a problem in polynomial approximation theory: find a sufficient degree-$d$ polynomial series to approximate $e^{-i\tau x}$ on $[-1,1]$ within error $\epsilon$. While $d\in\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\tau)$ is known to be asymptotically optimal, there exists a gap between state-of-the-art bounds and the optimal constant multiplicative factor, which is approximately equal to 1. Here, we close this gap almost entirely, to the point where possible future improvements will not be of practical significance. Our improvement resides in a careful treatment of the Bessel tail in the Jacobi-Anger series using Kapteyn's and Watson's inequalities, thereby reducing the overhead estimates for all Hamiltonian simulation tasks on quantum computers by a factor of $\approx e/2$.
Abstract:Quantum signal processing (QSP) serves as the asymptotically optimal technique for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer. By approximating the time evolution operator via the Jacobi-Anger expansion, the Hamiltonian simulation problem reduces to a problem in polynomial approximation theory: find a sufficient degree-$d$ polynomial series to approximate $e^{-i\tau x}$ on $[-1,1]$ within error $\epsilon$. While $d\in\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\tau)$ is known to be asymptotically optimal, there exists a gap between state-of-the-art bounds and the optimal constant multiplicative factor, which is approximately equal to 1. Here, we close this gap almost entirely, to the point where possible future improvements will not be of practical significance. Our improvement resides in a careful treatment of the Bessel tail in the Jacobi-Anger series using Kapteyn's and Watson's inequalities, thereby reducing the overhead estimates for all Hamiltonian simulation tasks on quantum computers by a factor of $\approx e/2$.
arXiv:2608.02734 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.02734v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02734 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 231 words
Related coverage

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026

Researchers Simulate Spin Systems with Optimal Log(n) Depth
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 2, 2026

Quantum Simulation of Nuclear Dynamics in First Quantization
Quantum Journal · Sep 2, 2026

A new method unlocks quantum speedups for common chemistry simulations
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 11, 2026