Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research applies imitation learning via graph neural networks to automate theorem proving, significantly reducing the search steps required to construct connection tableaux compared to traditional symbolic backtracking. By treating proof construction as a policy problem within a formal calculus, the study demonstrates that learned policies can solve up to 46% more problems while transferring structural knowledge across different logical benchmarks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Imitation Learning for Connection-Tableau Construction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.26009v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: An automated theorem prover builds a proof step by step, choosing at each point what to add and what to remove. We cast this construction as a policy acting in a transition system induced by a formal calculus, which fixes which steps are sound: for clausal connection tableaux, leanCoP-style search and plCoP/rlCoP-style planning then become stateful policies over one interface, and policy-learning methods apply directly. We equip such policies with a graph neural network that scores proof edits from structure that transfers across problems, train it by imitation learning from found proofs, and measure how performance holds as we remove search scaffolding, from full symbolic backtracking to a policy the network drives alone. Within a fixed step budget on M2k, MPTP2078-bushy, and TPTP v9.2.1, learned policies solve up to 46% more problems than leanCoP, and reach proofs in an order of magnitude fewer steps.

Abstract:An automated theorem prover builds a proof step by step, choosing at each point what to add and what to remove. We cast this construction as a policy acting in a transition system induced by a formal calculus, which fixes which steps are sound: for clausal connection tableaux, leanCoP-style search and plCoP/rlCoP-style planning then become stateful policies over one interface, and policy-learning methods apply directly. We equip such policies with a graph neural network that scores proof edits from structure that transfers across problems, train it by imitation learning from found proofs, and measure how performance holds as we remove search scaffolding, from full symbolic backtracking to a policy the network drives alone. Within a fixed step budget on M2k, MPTP2078-bushy, and TPTP v9.2.1, learned policies solve up to 46% more problems than leanCoP, and reach proofs in an order of magnitude fewer steps.

9 pages. Code: this https URL

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO)

arXiv:2608.26009 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.26009v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26009 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words

Related coverage