Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

The paper uses an LLM for assembly plan generation and a vision-language model to verify the physical result, feeding that feedback back into replanning. It reports 86.9% construction success and 73.3% top-1 semantic recognisability, with the notable claim that physical constraints are learned online rather than from an accurate pre-built world model. Readers should weigh these as results from a specific robotic setup, and note that design quality did not improve monotonically across iterations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

IDfRA: Self-Verification for Iterative Design in Robotic Assembly

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2509.16998v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Design for Robotic Assembly (DfRA) remains largely dependent on manual planning and heuristic simulation, limiting scalability and robustness in complex industrial settings. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise for semantic reasoning and task planning, most approaches remain tightly coupled to pre-built simulators that assume an accurate world model. We introduce Iterative Design for Robotic Assembly (IDfRA), a closed-loop framework that combines an LLM for plan generation with a vision-language model (VLM) for execution assessment. Given a target structure and a partial environmental signature, the LLM proposes an assembly plan, the robot executes it once at test time, and the VLM evaluates the resulting state to provide feedback for replanning. Through this iterative planning-execution-verification loop, the system progressively improves semantic fidelity and physical feasibility. Crucially, IDfRA does not require an accurate a priori world model before deployment. Instead, physical constraints are discovered online through interaction, enabling adaptation to under-specified environments. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that IDfRA attains 73.3% top-1 accuracy in semantic recognisability, surpassing the baseline on this metric. Moreover, the resulting assembly plans exhibit robust physical feasibility, achieving an overall 86.9% construction success rate, with design quality improving across iterations, albeit not always monotonically. Pairwise human evaluation further corroborates the advantages of IDfRA relative to alternative approaches. By integrating self-verification with context-aware adaptation, the framework evidences strong potential for deployment in unstructured manufacturing scenarios.

Abstract:Design for Robotic Assembly (DfRA) remains largely dependent on manual planning and heuristic simulation, limiting scalability and robustness in complex industrial settings. Although large language models (LLMs) show promise for semantic reasoning and task planning, most approaches remain tightly coupled to pre-built simulators that assume an accurate world model. We introduce Iterative Design for Robotic Assembly (IDfRA), a closed-loop framework that combines an LLM for plan generation with a vision-language model (VLM) for execution assessment. Given a target structure and a partial environmental signature, the LLM proposes an assembly plan, the robot executes it once at test time, and the VLM evaluates the resulting state to provide feedback for replanning. Through this iterative planning-execution-verification loop, the system progressively improves semantic fidelity and physical feasibility. Crucially, IDfRA does not require an accurate a priori world model before deployment. Instead, physical constraints are discovered online through interaction, enabling adaptation to under-specified environments. Empirical evaluation demonstrates that IDfRA attains 73.3% top-1 accuracy in semantic recognisability, surpassing the baseline on this metric. Moreover, the resulting assembly plans exhibit robust physical feasibility, achieving an overall 86.9% construction success rate, with design quality improving across iterations, albeit not always monotonically. Pairwise human evaluation further corroborates the advantages of IDfRA relative to alternative approaches. By integrating self-verification with context-aware adaptation, the framework evidences strong potential for deployment in unstructured manufacturing scenarios.

8 pages, 8 figures. Published at ICRA 2026

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2509.16998 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2509.16998v2 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.16998 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

2026 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Vienna, Austria, 2026, pp. 1831-1838

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA57385.2026.11697014 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 347 words

Related coverage