aiqbench analysis
This research applies multihead neural networks to classify gravitational-wave phase deviations, demonstrating that identification limits are primarily dictated by intrinsic similarities between physical signal families rather than network architecture. The study provides a rigorous benchmark for using machine learning in general relativity and gravitational wave astronomy, highlighting the challenges of distinguishing near-degenerate post-Einsteinian parameters.
Identifiability Limits of Gravitational Wave Phase Deviations: Multiclass Classification with a Multihead Neural Network
arXiv:2609.31993v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how well gravitational-wave phase deviations can be identified using a neural network with classification and regression heads. The classification head distinguishes general relativity (GR) from six parametrized post-Einsteinian phase families with exponents $b\in\{-7,-5,-3,-1,+1,+2\}$; the regression head predicts the logarithm of the coupling magnitude, $\log_{10}|\beta|$. The network input is a response function quantifying the sensitivity of waveform mismatch to waveform deformations. We use stationary Gaussian noise with the Advanced LIGO design spectrum for 262 sources and a measured Hanford spectrum from the third observing run (O3) for 132 sources, and also test injections into recorded Hanford strain. On the two Gaussian datasets, the network identifies the exponent of deviations clearly above the noise with accuracies of $0.427$ and $0.329$. To interpret these results, we compare the network with an approximate classifier built from predicted waveform residuals for the six phase families and same sources. The two classifiers often confuse the same families. Examining residuals left by different phase corrections, we link these errors to similarities between the underlying deviations. On selected recorded Hanford strain, networks trained on simulated or recorded noise achieve overall classification accuracies close to those on simulated Hanford noise. Of thirteen neural-network variants tested on the Advanced LIGO design dataset, the recurrent network has the highest mean classification accuracy for loud deviations, although all variants remain below the approximate classifier. The network nearly matches that classifier's accuracy, indicating that identification is limited by similarities between neighboring phase families rather than by the network, for known intrinsic source parameters.
Abstract:We study how well gravitational-wave phase deviations can be identified using a neural network with classification and regression heads. The classification head distinguishes general relativity (GR) from six parametrized post-Einsteinian phase families with exponents $b\in\{-7,-5,-3,-1,+1,+2\}$; the regression head predicts the logarithm of the coupling magnitude, $\log_{10}|\beta|$. The network input is a response function quantifying the sensitivity of waveform mismatch to waveform deformations. We use stationary Gaussian noise with the Advanced LIGO design spectrum for 262 sources and a measured Hanford spectrum from the third observing run (O3) for 132 sources, and also test injections into recorded Hanford strain. On the two Gaussian datasets, the network identifies the exponent of deviations clearly above the noise with accuracies of $0.427$ and $0.329$. To interpret these results, we compare the network with an approximate classifier built from predicted waveform residuals for the six phase families and same sources. The two classifiers often confuse the same families. Examining residuals left by different phase corrections, we link these errors to similarities between the underlying deviations. On selected recorded Hanford strain, networks trained on simulated or recorded noise achieve overall classification accuracies close to those on simulated Hanford noise. Of thirteen neural-network variants tested on the Advanced LIGO design dataset, the recurrent network has the highest mean classification accuracy for loud deviations, although all variants remain below the approximate classifier. The network nearly matches that classifier's accuracy, indicating that identification is limited by similarities between neighboring phase families rather than by the network, for known intrinsic source parameters.
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology (gr-qc); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability (physics.data-an)
arXiv:2609.31993 [gr-qc]
(or arXiv:2609.31993v1 [gr-qc] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31993 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 358 words
Related coverage
Deep Learning Detection of Beyond-General-Relativity Deviations in Gravitational-Wave Signals: A Detection-Threshold Study with Real LIGO Noise
arXiv · Sep 18, 2026

Third Form of Magnetism Earns Europe Top Physics Prize : Could Reshape AI Hardware
techtimes.com · Jul 26, 2026

Entanglement analysis matches order found in Rydberg atom chains
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 13, 2026

Ergodicity broken in quantum systems even after long evolution
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 11, 2026